Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

server,executor: split ResultSet Close() to Finish() and Close() (#49224) #49304

Conversation

ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This is an automated cherry-pick of #49224

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #48667

Problem Summary:

What changed and how does it work?

In the old interface design, ResultSet.Close() may return error, and we must make sure the error is returned to the client, otherwise we get this issue #48446

In the previous #48447 I make sure the error is returned, but that cause peformance regression #48667

So the idea is split the work of Close() into two: the part that may return error and the part that may not return error.

	Finish() error
	Close()

We call Finish() first and writeEOF(), then call Close().

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)

Run sysbench and get the flamegraph:

image

image

Now Close() will be after writeChunks() and there is a Finish() call inside writeChunks().

  • No need to test
    • I checked and no code files have been changed.

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <ti-community-prow-bot@tidb.io>
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. type/cherry-pick-for-release-7.5 This PR is cherry-picked to release-7.5 from a source PR. labels Dec 8, 2023
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Dec 8, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign winkyao for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. label Dec 8, 2023
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Dec 8, 2023

@ti-chi-bot: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/unit-test ccf0607 link true /test unit-test
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/check_dev_2 ccf0607 link true /test check-dev2
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/check_dev ccf0607 link true /test check-dev
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/mysql-test ccf0607 link true /test mysql-test
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/build ccf0607 link true /test build

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. type/cherry-pick-for-release-7.5 This PR is cherry-picked to release-7.5 from a source PR.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants