Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: mpz-ot #109

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 7, 2024
Merged

refactor: mpz-ot #109

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 7, 2024

Conversation

sinui0
Copy link
Collaborator

@sinui0 sinui0 commented Mar 5, 2024

This PR builds on #107 and #108 , refactoring our OT traits and implementations. It also deletes the KOS actor now that we have the mpz_common::sync::Mutex primitive 🙏

I haven't finished with the committed/verifiable functionalities on the shared KOS variants yet, but will punt that to another PR so we can just move on for now.

Copy link
Member

@th4s th4s left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

gw 👍

ot/mpz-ot/src/kos/shared_receiver.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
Base automatically changed from mpz-cointoss to threading-refactor March 7, 2024 16:21
@sinui0
Copy link
Collaborator Author

sinui0 commented Mar 7, 2024

Proceeding with merge as this should not introduce security issues, but @themighty1 if you get a time to sanity check where I've touched the coin-toss protocols in CO15 and KOS15 that would be appreciated 🙏

@sinui0 sinui0 merged commit 78a9047 into threading-refactor Mar 7, 2024
@sinui0 sinui0 deleted the refactor/mpz-ot branch March 7, 2024 16:38
@sinui0 sinui0 mentioned this pull request Mar 7, 2024
7 tasks
sinui0 added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2024
sinui0 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2024
sinui0 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants