Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Correct docstring for SAGEConv #4852

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 24, 2022
Merged

Correct docstring for SAGEConv #4852

merged 3 commits into from
Jun 24, 2022

Conversation

JiaxuanYou
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@JiaxuanYou JiaxuanYou added the bug label Jun 23, 2022
@JiaxuanYou JiaxuanYou self-assigned this Jun 23, 2022
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 23, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #4852 (d1f6288) into master (ded9a7b) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #4852   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   82.78%   82.78%           
=======================================
  Files         326      326           
  Lines       17635    17635           
=======================================
  Hits        14600    14600           
  Misses       3035     3035           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
torch_geometric/nn/conv/sage_conv.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ded9a7b...d1f6288. Read the comment docs.

@rusty1s rusty1s changed the title Correct docstring for SAGEConv Correct docstring for SAGEConv Jun 24, 2022
Copy link
Member

@rusty1s rusty1s left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@rusty1s rusty1s merged commit 32db993 into master Jun 24, 2022
@rusty1s rusty1s deleted the sageconv_doc branch June 24, 2022 03:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants