Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove unnecessary code from dask-cudf _Frame #12001

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 27, 2022

Conversation

rjzamora
Copy link
Member

@rjzamora rjzamora commented Oct 26, 2022

Description

Removes unnecessary code from dask_cudf.core._Frame that is already handled in the super-class (dask.dataframe.core._Frame). By removing the unnecessary __init__ logic from dask_cudf, we can avoid breakages from upstream changes like dask/dask#9473.

Checklist

  • I am familiar with the Contributing Guidelines.
  • New or existing tests cover these changes.
  • The documentation is up to date with these changes.

@rjzamora rjzamora added 2 - In Progress Currently a work in progress code quality dask Dask issue non-breaking Non-breaking change labels Oct 26, 2022
@rjzamora rjzamora requested a review from a team as a code owner October 26, 2022 17:03
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Python Affects Python cuDF API. label Oct 26, 2022
@rjzamora rjzamora added tech debt improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function and removed code quality labels Oct 26, 2022
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 26, 2022

Codecov Report

Base: 87.40% // Head: 88.16% // Increases project coverage by +0.75% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (703b2d2) compared to base (f72c4ce).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##           branch-22.12   #12001      +/-   ##
================================================
+ Coverage         87.40%   88.16%   +0.75%     
================================================
  Files               133      133              
  Lines             21833    21977     +144     
================================================
+ Hits              19084    19375     +291     
+ Misses             2749     2602     -147     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
python/strings_udf/strings_udf/__init__.py 86.27% <0.00%> (-10.61%) ⬇️
python/cudf/cudf/io/text.py 91.66% <0.00%> (-8.34%) ⬇️
python/cudf/cudf/core/_base_index.py 82.20% <0.00%> (-3.35%) ⬇️
python/strings_udf/strings_udf/_typing.py 94.73% <0.00%> (-1.06%) ⬇️
python/cudf/cudf/testing/dataset_generator.py 72.83% <0.00%> (-0.42%) ⬇️
python/dask_cudf/dask_cudf/core.py 73.72% <0.00%> (-0.41%) ⬇️
python/dask_cudf/dask_cudf/backends.py 84.90% <0.00%> (-0.37%) ⬇️
python/cudf/cudf/io/orc.py 92.94% <0.00%> (-0.09%) ⬇️
python/cudf/cudf/__init__.py 90.69% <0.00%> (ø)
python/cudf/cudf/core/udf/_ops.py 100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 23 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@rjzamora rjzamora self-assigned this Oct 26, 2022
@rjzamora rjzamora added 3 - Ready for Review Ready for review by team and removed 2 - In Progress Currently a work in progress labels Oct 26, 2022
@galipremsagar galipremsagar added 5 - Ready to Merge Testing and reviews complete, ready to merge and removed 3 - Ready for Review Ready for review by team labels Oct 27, 2022
@galipremsagar
Copy link
Contributor

@gpucibot merge

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit cd21ce7 into rapidsai:branch-22.12 Oct 27, 2022
@rjzamora rjzamora deleted the cleanup-dask-cudf-init branch October 27, 2022 17:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
5 - Ready to Merge Testing and reviews complete, ready to merge dask Dask issue improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change Python Affects Python cuDF API.
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants