Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update JNI build to use CUDF_USE_ARROW_STATIC [skip ci] #7526

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 6, 2021

Conversation

jlowe
Copy link
Member

@jlowe jlowe commented Mar 6, 2021

This updates the Java build scripts and documentation to use the new CUDF_USE_ARROW_STATIC flag after the rename from ARROW_STATIC_LIB in #7518.

@jlowe jlowe added bug Something isn't working CMake CMake build issue Java Affects Java cuDF API. 4 - Needs cuDF (Java) Reviewer non-breaking Non-breaking change labels Mar 6, 2021
@jlowe jlowe self-assigned this Mar 6, 2021
@jlowe jlowe requested a review from a team as a code owner March 6, 2021 05:13
@kkraus14
Copy link
Collaborator

kkraus14 commented Mar 6, 2021

@gpucibot merge

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit 429e296 into rapidsai:branch-0.19 Mar 6, 2021
hyperbolic2346 pushed a commit to hyperbolic2346/cudf that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2021
This updates the Java build scripts and documentation to use the new CUDF_USE_ARROW_STATIC flag after the rename from ARROW_STATIC_LIB in rapidsai#7518.

Authors:
  - Jason Lowe (@jlowe)

Approvers:
  - Alessandro Bellina (@abellina)
  - Keith Kraus (@kkraus14)

URL: rapidsai#7526
@jlowe jlowe deleted the jni-arrow-static branch September 10, 2021 15:46
@vyasr vyasr added 4 - Needs Review Waiting for reviewer to review or respond and removed 4 - Needs cuDF (Java) Reviewer labels Feb 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
4 - Needs Review Waiting for reviewer to review or respond bug Something isn't working CMake CMake build issue Java Affects Java cuDF API. non-breaking Non-breaking change
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants