Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix code typo for Coiled #456

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 9, 2024
Merged

Conversation

jacobtomlinson
Copy link
Member

Add a couple of small tweaks to the Coiled instructions.

@jacobtomlinson jacobtomlinson added the platform/coiled Runs on Coiled label Oct 9, 2024
@jacobtomlinson jacobtomlinson requested a review from a team as a code owner October 9, 2024 11:08
@jacobtomlinson jacobtomlinson merged commit e8a3332 into rapidsai:main Oct 9, 2024
3 checks passed
@jacobtomlinson jacobtomlinson deleted the fix-coiled branch October 9, 2024 13:38
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ We can also connect a Dask client to see that information for the workers too.
```python
from dask.distributed import Client

client = Client
client = Client(cluster)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Coming around to this PR now as I'm going through the Coiled deployment process - is this example meant to be specific to the Jupyter server case, or more an illustration of how to connect a Dask client generally?

Depending on the answer, might be worth clarifying here that (the screenshot below seems to imply) we can just use Client() from the Jupyter server to automatically connect to the spawned cluster

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's a good point. The correct fix here would've just been Client() because this was referring to using it within the Jupyter session. @charlesbluca would you mind making a follow-up PR here?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah sure! Fixed in #473

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
platform/coiled Runs on Coiled
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants