Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

E0013 confusing diagnostic #68038

Closed
RustyYato opened this issue Jan 9, 2020 · 0 comments · Fixed by #68079
Closed

E0013 confusing diagnostic #68038

RustyYato opened this issue Jan 9, 2020 · 0 comments · Fixed by #68079
Labels
A-diagnostics Area: Messages for errors, warnings, and lints D-confusing Diagnostics: Confusing error or lint that should be reworked. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Comments

@RustyYato
Copy link
Contributor

static FOO: u8 = 0;
const FOO_REF: &u8 = &FOO;

gives

error[E0013]: constants cannot refer to statics, use a constant instead
 --> src/lib.rs:3:22
  |
3 | const FOO_REF: &u8 = &FOO;
  |                      ^^^^

error: aborting due to previous error

For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0013`.
error: could not compile `playground`.

The wording constants cannot refer to statics, use a constant instead is confusing

@Centril Centril added D-confusing Diagnostics: Confusing error or lint that should be reworked. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. A-diagnostics Area: Messages for errors, warnings, and lints labels Jan 9, 2020
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this issue Jan 11, 2020
@bors bors closed this as completed in ba14f94 Jan 11, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-diagnostics Area: Messages for errors, warnings, and lints D-confusing Diagnostics: Confusing error or lint that should be reworked. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants