Rollup of 7 pull requests #101092
Closed
Rollup of 7 pull requests #101092
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
We have `File::create` for creating a file or opening an existing file, but the secure way to guarantee creating a new file requires a longhand invocation via `OpenOptions`. Add `File::create_new` to handle this case, to make it easier for people to do secure file creation.
I refactored the code: - Removed handling of methods, as it felt entirely unnecessary - Removed clippy utils (obviously...) - Used some shiny compiler features (let-else is very handy for lints 👀) - I also renamed the lint to `for_loop_over_fallibles` (note: no `s`). I'm not sure what's the naming convention here, so maybe I'm wrong.
if the iterator is used after the loop, we need to use `.by_ref()`
The loop could contain `break;` that won't work with an `if let`
Add a `File::create_new` constructor We have `File::create` for creating a file or opening an existing file, but the secure way to guarantee creating a new file requires a longhand invocation via `OpenOptions`. Add `File::create_new` to handle this case, to make it easier for people to do secure file creation.
…alfJung Strengthen invalid_value lint to forbid uninit primitives, adjust docs to say that's UB For context: rust-lang#66151 (comment) This does not make it a FCW, but it does explicitly state in the docs that uninit integers are UB. This also doesn't affect any runtime behavior, uninit u32's will still successfully be created through mem::uninitialized.
Uplift `clippy::for_loops_over_fallibles` lint into rustc
This PR, as the title suggests, uplifts [`clippy::for_loops_over_fallibles`] lint into rustc. This lint warns for code like this:
```rust
for _ in Some(1) {}
for _ in Ok::<_, ()>(1) {}
```
i.e. directly iterating over `Option` and `Result` using `for` loop.
There are a number of suggestions that this PR adds (on top of what clippy suggested):
1. If the argument (? is there a better name for that expression) of a `for` loop is a `.next()` call, then we can suggest removing it (or rather replacing with `.by_ref()` to allow iterator being used later)
```rust
for _ in iter.next() {}
// turns into
for _ in iter.by_ref() {}
```
2. (otherwise) We can suggest using `while let`, this is useful for non-iterator, iterator-like things like [async] channels
```rust
for _ in rx.recv() {}
// turns into
while let Some(_) = rx.recv() {}
```
3. If the argument type is `Result<impl IntoIterator, _>` and the body has a `Result<_, _>` type, we can suggest using `?`
```rust
for _ in f() {}
// turns into
for _ in f()? {}
```
4. To preserve the original behavior and clear intent, we can suggest using `if let`
```rust
for _ in f() {}
// turns into
if let Some(_) = f() {}
```
(P.S. `Some` and `Ok` are interchangeable depending on the type)
I still feel that the lint wording/look is somewhat off, so I'll be happy to hear suggestions (on how to improve suggestions :D)!
Resolves rust-lang#99272
[`clippy::for_loops_over_fallibles`]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#for_loops_over_fallibles
…g, r=JohnTitor Stabilize `std::io::read_to_string` Closes rust-lang#80218. 🎉 **Blocked on FCP finishing**
…tch-err, r=oli-obk Improve const mismatch `FulfillmentError` Fixes rust-lang#100414
…, r=thomcc Use `DisplayBuffer` for socket addresses. Continuation of rust-lang#100625 for socket addresses. Renames `net::addr` to `net::addr::socket`, `net::ip` to `net::addr::ip` and `net::ip::display_buffer::IpDisplayBuffer` to `net::addr::display_buffer::DisplayBuffer`.
…ds, r=spastorino
Do not report too many expr field candidates
When considering "this expressions' field has a {field/method}" suggestions:
1. Don't report methods that are out of scope
2. Use `span_suggestions` instead of reporting each field candidate, which caps the number of suggestions to 4
4. Blacklist some common traits like `Clone` and `Deref`
Fixes rust-lang#100894
rustbot
added
T-compiler
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=5 |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
|
⌛ Testing commit 11905c6 with merge 2bad1a28bafb628d6cd324046f2e798fd366961d... |
|
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot) |
|
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot) |
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
File::create_newconstructor #98801 (Add aFile::create_newconstructor)clippy::for_loops_over_fallibleslint into rustc #99696 (Upliftclippy::for_loops_over_fallibleslint into rustc)std::io::read_to_string#100337 (Stabilizestd::io::read_to_string)FulfillmentError#100437 (Improve const mismatchFulfillmentError)DisplayBufferfor socket addresses. #100640 (UseDisplayBufferfor socket addresses.)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup