Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 4 pull requests #106143

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Dec 26, 2022
Merged

Rollup of 4 pull requests #106143

merged 8 commits into from
Dec 26, 2022

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

WaffleLapkin and others added 8 commits December 6, 2022 14:32
They are trivial and just forward to the option. Like most other
options, we can just access it directly.
match_result_ok
obfuscated_if_else
single_char_add
writeln_empty_string
collapsible_match
iter_cloned_collect
unnecessary_mut_passed
Fix an outdated comment mentioning parameter that doesn't exist anymore

I'm not too familiar with the code in question, but from what I see I think the new comment makes sense.

r? `@cjgillot` (you touched these arguments lately https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/91557/files#diff-ad0c15bbde97a607d4758ec7eaf88248be5d6b8ae084dfc84127f81e3f7a9bb4L1702, https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/104048/files#diff-ad0c15bbde97a607d4758ec7eaf88248be5d6b8ae084dfc84127f81e3f7a9bb4L1682)
…we-have-field-accesses-for-that, r=cjgillot

Remove wrapper functions for some unstable options

They are trivial and just forward to the option. Like most other options, we can just access it directly.
fix more clippy::style findings

match_result_ok
obfuscated_if_else
single_char_add
writeln_empty_string
collapsible_match
iter_cloned_collect
unnecessary_mut_passed

r? `@compiler-errors`
…, r=notriddle

Migrate links-color.goml to functions

r? `@notriddle`
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Dec 25, 2022
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=4

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 25, 2022

📌 Commit a054e70 has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 25, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 25, 2022

⌛ Testing commit a054e70 with merge 797b5f0...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 26, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing 797b5f0 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Dec 26, 2022
@bors bors merged commit 797b5f0 into rust-lang:master Dec 26, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.68.0 milestone Dec 26, 2022
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR# Perf Build Sha
#106140 e513d036382597a9af00cc371dadabc8ead878c8
#106137 3cc35de88df596314326fcefe84a70b20cc0d66f
#105955 352981229807759e78e258de1f3a50d23cc96d34
#105375 33e73ea9bc6d77a9e9e7cd2bff5ac67e8d788df0

previous master: 8dfb339541

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (797b5f0): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
4.1% [4.1%, 4.1%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
1.4% [1.4%, 1.4%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.8% [2.4%, 3.6%] 4
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 1.4% [1.4%, 1.4%] 1

@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the rollup-3kpy1dc branch March 16, 2024 18:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants