Pull some tuple variant fields out into their own struct #109723
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @Nilstrieb (or someone else) soon. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (
|
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
Some changes occurred in src/tools/rustfmt cc @rust-lang/rustfmt Some changes occurred in src/tools/clippy cc @rust-lang/clippy |
Noratrieb
reviewed
Mar 29, 2023
Noratrieb
reviewed
Apr 1, 2023
| ast::ItemKind::Const(def, ty, body) => { | ||
| self.print_item_const(item.ident, None, ty, body.as_deref(), &item.vis, *def); | ||
| ast::ItemKind::Const(box ast::ConstItem { defaultness, ty, expr }) => { | ||
| self.print_item_const( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
print_item_const could now take an ast::ConstItem as an argument
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Unfortunately this doesn't work yet. We'll need to merge the shared parts of const items and static items first.
Noratrieb
added
S-waiting-on-author
|
@bors r=Nilstrieb |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 4, 2023
…mpiler-errors Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#109723 (Pull some tuple variant fields out into their own struct) - rust-lang#109838 (Fix `non_exhaustive_omitted_patterns` lint span) - rust-lang#109901 (Enforce VarDebugInfo::Place in MIR validation.) - rust-lang#109913 (Doc-comment `IndexVec::from_elem` and use it in a few more places) - rust-lang#109914 (Emit feature error for parenthesized generics in associated type bounds) - rust-lang#109919 (rustdoc: escape GAT args in more cases) - rust-lang#109937 (Don't collect return-position impl traits for documentation) - rust-lang#109938 (Move a const-prop-lint specific hack from mir interpret to const-prop-lint and make it fallible) - rust-lang#109940 (Add regression test for rust-lang#93911) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is groundwork for adding more fields to those new structs, but I believe the change to be useful on its own.
r? @Nilstrieb but feel free to reroll for
compiler