Specialize try_destructure_mir_constant for its sole user (pretty printing)
#113291
Conversation
|
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @RalfJung (or someone else) soon. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (
|
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
Some changes occurred to the CTFE / Miri engine cc @rust-lang/miri |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We can't remove the query, as we need to invoke it from rustc_middle, but can only implement it in mir interpretation/const eval.
Ah, that is unfortunate, but it makes sense.
Can you change the name and docs of the query to reflect that it is to be used for diagnostic purposes only?
oli-obk
force-pushed
the
pretty_print_mir_const
branch
from
21c62f5
to
e1e04a8
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Some changes occurred in src/tools/clippy cc @rust-lang/clippy |
| no_hash | ||
| eval_always |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I have no idea what these do so I will just trust they make sense. ;)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Mostly turning the query into a glorified function pointer (caching disabled). I think we have a better way nowadays, but I need to look it up
|
@bors r=RalfJung |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
|
Finished benchmarking commit (bd8aabe): comparison URL. Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. CyclesResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 658.504s -> 657.658s (-0.13%) |
…lfJung Specialize `try_destructure_mir_constant` for its sole user (pretty printing) We can't remove the query, as we need to invoke it from rustc_middle, but can only implement it in mir interpretation/const eval. r? `@RalfJung` for a first round. While we could move all the logic into pretty printing, that would end up duplicating a bit of code with const eval, which doesn't seem great either.
We can't remove the query, as we need to invoke it from rustc_middle, but can only implement it in mir interpretation/const eval.
r? @RalfJung for a first round.
While we could move all the logic into pretty printing, that would end up duplicating a bit of code with const eval, which doesn't seem great either.