Rollup of 7 pull requests #120290
Closed
Rollup of 7 pull requests #120290
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Don't skip the inconsistent data layout check for custom LLVMs. With rust-lang#118708, all targets will have a simple test that would trigger this check if LLVM's data layouts do change - so data layouts would be corrected during the LLVM upgrade. Therefore, with builtin targets, this check won't trigger with our LLVM because each target will have been confirmed to work. With non-builtin targets, this check is probably useful to have because you can change the data layout in your target and if its wrong then that could lead to bugs. When using a custom LLVM, the same justification makes sense for non-builtin targets as with our LLVM, the user can update their target to match their LLVM and that's probably a good thing to do. However, with a custom LLVM, the user cannot change the builtin target data layouts if they don't match - though given that the compiler's data layout is used for layout computation and a bunch of other things - you could get some bugs because of the mismatch and probably want to know about that. `CFG_LLVM_ROOT` was also always set during local development with `download-ci-llvm` so this bug would never trigger locally. Signed-off-by: David Wood <david@davidtw.co>
On ELF, the text section is opened with ".text", on MachO with ".section __TEXT,__text". Previously, on ELF this test was actually matching a GNU note section, which is no longer emitted on Solaris starting with LLVM 18. Fixes rust-lang#120105.
It looks like none of these are actually needed.
Also add tests for min-system-llvm-version.
…wiser coverage: Never emit improperly-ordered coverage regions If we emit a coverage region that is improperly ordered (end < start), `llvm-cov` will fail with `coveragemap_error::malformed`, which is inconvenient for users and also very hard to debug. Ideally we would fix the root causes of these situations, but they tend to occur in very obscure edge-case scenarios (often involving nested macros), and we don't always have a good MCVE to work from. So it makes sense to also have a catch-all check that will prevent improperly-ordered regions from ever being emitted. --- This is mainly aimed at resolving rust-lang#119453. We don't have a specific way to reproduce it, which is why I haven't been able to add a test case in this PR. But based on the information provided in that issue, this change seems likely to avoid the error in `llvm-cov`. ```@rustbot``` label +A-code-coverage
…r=wesleywiser llvm: change data layout bug to an error and make it trigger more Fixes rust-lang#33446. Don't skip the inconsistent data layout check for custom LLVMs or non-built-in targets. With rust-lang#118708, all targets will have a simple test that would trigger this error if LLVM's data layouts do change - so data layouts would be corrected during the LLVM upgrade. Therefore, with builtin targets, this error won't happen with our LLVM because each target will have been confirmed to work. With non-builtin targets, this error is probably useful to have because you can change the data layout in your target and if it is wrong then that could lead to bugs. When using a custom LLVM, the same justification makes sense for non-builtin targets as with our LLVM, the user can update their target to match their LLVM and that's probably a good thing to do. However, with a custom LLVM, the user cannot change the builtin target data layouts if they don't match - though given that the compiler's data layout is used for layout computation and a bunch of other things - you could get some bugs because of the mismatch and probably want to know about that. I'm not sure if this is something that people do and is okay, but I doubt it? `CFG_LLVM_ROOT` was also always set during local development with `download-ci-llvm` so this bug would never trigger locally. In rust-lang#33446, two points are raised: - In the issue itself, changing this from a `bug!` to a proper error is what is suggested, by using `isCompatibleDataLayout` from LLVM, but that function still just does the same thing that we do and check for equality, so I've avoided the additional code necessary to do that FFI call. - ```@Mark-Simulacrum``` suggests a different check is necessary to maintain backwards compatibility with old LLVM versions. I don't know how often this comes up, but we can do that with some simple string manipulation + LLVM version checks as happens already for LLVM 17 just above this diff.
Split assembly tests for ELF and MachO On ELF, the text section is opened with ".text", on MachO with ".section __TEXT,__text". Previously, on ELF this test was actually matching a GNU note section, which is no longer emitted on Solaris starting with LLVM 18. Fixes rust-lang#120105. r? ```@davidtwco```
…direction, r=dtolnay Switch `NonZero` alias direction. Step 4 mentioned in rust-lang#100428 (review). Depends on rust-lang#120160. r? `@dtolnay`
coverage: Don't instrument `#[automatically_derived]` functions This PR makes the coverage instrumentor detect and skip functions that have [`#[automatically_derived]`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/attributes/derive.html#the-automatically_derived-attribute) on their enclosing impl block. Most notably, this means that methods generated by built-in derives (e.g. `Clone`, `Debug`, `PartialEq`) are now ignored by coverage instrumentation, and won't appear as executed or not-executed in coverage reports. This is a noticeable change in user-visible behaviour, but overall I think it's a net improvement. For example, we've had a few user requests for this sort of change (e.g. rust-lang#105055, rust-lang#84605 (comment)), and I believe it's the behaviour that most users will expect/prefer by default. It's possible to imagine situations where users would want to instrument these derived implementations, but I think it's OK to treat that as an opportunity to consider adding more fine-grained option flags to control the details of coverage instrumentation, while leaving this new behaviour as the default. (Also note that while `-Cinstrument-coverage` is a stable feature, the exact details of coverage instrumentation are allowed to change. So we *can* make this change; the main question is whether we *should*.) Fixes rust-lang#105055.
Remove no-system-llvm We currently have a bunch of codegen tests that use no-system-llvm -- however, all of those tests also pass with system LLVM 16. I've opted to remove `no-system-llvm` entirely, as there's basically no valid use case for it anymore: * The only thing this option could have legitimately been used for (testing the target feature support that requires an LLVM patch) doesn't use it, and the need for this will go away with LLVM 18 anyway. * In cases where the test depends on optimizations/fixes from newer LLVM versions, `min-llvm-version` should be used instead. * In case it depends on optimization/fixes from newer LLVM versions that have been backported into our fork, `min-system-llvm-version` (with the major version larger than the one in our fork) should be used instead. r? ```@cuviper```
Remove extra # from url in suggestion The suggestion added in rust-lang#119805 contains an unnecessary # hash sign.
rustbot
added
A-testsuite
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=7 |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 24, 2024
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#119460 (coverage: Never emit improperly-ordered coverage regions) - rust-lang#120062 (llvm: change data layout bug to an error and make it trigger more) - rust-lang#120124 (Split assembly tests for ELF and MachO) - rust-lang#120165 (Switch `NonZero` alias direction.) - rust-lang#120185 (coverage: Don't instrument `#[automatically_derived]` functions) - rust-lang#120265 (Remove no-system-llvm) - rust-lang#120285 (Remove extra # from url in suggestion) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot) |
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
NonZeroalias direction. #120165 (SwitchNonZeroalias direction.)#[automatically_derived]functions #120185 (coverage: Don't instrument#[automatically_derived]functions)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup