Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "Use the HIR instead of mir_keys for determining whether something will have a MIR body." #126077

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 7, 2024

Conversation

oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

@oli-obk oli-obk commented Jun 6, 2024

This reverts commit e5cba17.

turns out SMIR still needs it (model-checking/kani#3218). I'll create a full plan and MCP for what I intended this to be a part of. Maybe my plan is nonsense anyway.

…hing will have a MIR body."

This reverts commit e5cba17.
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jun 6, 2024

r? @BoxyUwU

rustbot has assigned @BoxyUwU.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jun 6, 2024
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jun 6, 2024

Some changes occurred to MIR optimizations

cc @rust-lang/wg-mir-opt

@BoxyUwU
Copy link
Member

BoxyUwU commented Jun 6, 2024

Do you want to add a SMIR test in this PR?

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor Author

oli-obk commented Jun 6, 2024

I should, but I had like 5 mins which wasn't enough to run any tests. Maybe tomorrow

@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ fn test_stable_mir() -> ControlFlow<()> {
// Get all items and split generic vs monomorphic items.
let (generic, mono): (Vec<_>, Vec<_>) =
items.into_iter().partition(|item| item.requires_monomorphization());
assert_eq!(mono.len(), 3, "Expected 2 mono functions and one constant");
assert_eq!(mono.len(), 4, "Expected 2 mono functions and one constant");
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

2 mono functions and one constant adds up to 3 items not 4 xd

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor Author

oli-obk commented Jun 7, 2024

@bors r=BoxyUwU

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 7, 2024

📌 Commit 9461852 has been approved by BoxyUwU

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 7, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 11 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#124012 (Stabilize `binary_heap_as_slice`)
 - rust-lang#124214 (Parse unsafe attributes)
 - rust-lang#125572 (Detect pub structs never constructed and unused associated constants)
 - rust-lang#125781 (prefer `compile::stream_cargo` for building tools)
 - rust-lang#126030 (Update `./x fmt` command in library/std/src/sys/pal/windows/c/README.md)
 - rust-lang#126047 (Simplify the rayon calls in the installer)
 - rust-lang#126052 (More `rustc_parse` cleanups)
 - rust-lang#126077 (Revert "Use the HIR instead of mir_keys for determining whether something will have a MIR body.")
 - rust-lang#126089 (Stabilize Option::take_if)
 - rust-lang#126112 (Clean up source root in run-make tests)
 - rust-lang#126119 (Improve docs for using custom paths with `--emit`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 2e82d7f into rust-lang:master Jun 7, 2024
6 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.80.0 milestone Jun 7, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#126077 - oli-obk:revert_is_mir_available, r=BoxyUwU

Revert "Use the HIR instead of mir_keys for determining whether something will have a MIR body."

This reverts commit e5cba17.

turns out SMIR still needs it (model-checking/kani#3218). I'll create a full plan and MCP for what I intended this to be a part of. Maybe my plan is nonsense anyway.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants