Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Let any bootstrap key suffice to allow features #37271

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

cuviper
Copy link
Member

@cuviper cuviper commented Oct 19, 2016

This is a follow-up to pull request #32812, according to the new
decision in issue #36548 to relax bootstrap key logic. Now any
non-empty bootstrap key is allowed to circumvent the feature gate.

For now, the build system still goes through the same motions to set
RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP_KEY according to the prior system. This is necessary
at least until the next stage0 base includes this relaxed key check.
It also makes it simpler to revert this if we change our mind.

This is a follow-up to pull request rust-lang#32812, according to the new
decision in issue rust-lang#36548 to relax bootstrap key logic.  Now *any*
non-empty bootstrap key is allowed to circumvent the feature gate.

For now, the build system still goes through the same motions to set
RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP_KEY according to the prior system.  This is necessary
at least until the next stage0 base includes this relaxed key check.
It also makes it simpler to revert this if we change our mind.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @nrc

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@cuviper
Copy link
Member Author

cuviper commented Oct 19, 2016

cc @brson @alexcrichton

@TimNN
Copy link
Contributor

TimNN commented Oct 19, 2016

There's already #37265 with the same purpose.

@cuviper
Copy link
Member Author

cuviper commented Oct 19, 2016

Ah, @brson is a machine!

@cuviper cuviper closed this Oct 19, 2016
@cuviper cuviper deleted the laissez-faire-bootstrap branch October 19, 2017 23:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants