Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Rollup of 5 pull requests #80212

Closed
wants to merge 11 commits into from
Closed

Rollup of 5 pull requests #80212

wants to merge 11 commits into from

Conversation

Dylan-DPC-zz
Copy link

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

yoshuawuyts and others added 11 commits November 30, 2020 10:49
@yoshuawuyts
Stabilize core::slice::fill
52eade1
@beepster4096
fix memory leak in test
01f36c5
@jackh726
Make BoundRegion have a kind of BoungRegionKind
328fcee
@beepster4096
Fix unused import error on wasm
28e0d2f
@mark-i-m
implement edition-specific :pat behavior for 2015/18
1a7d00a
@poliorcetics
impl Default for LangString, replacing all_false by default
74bd2ea
@Dylan-DPC
Rollup merge of rust-lang#79213 - yoshuawuyts:stabilize-slice-fill, r…
f130574 
…=m-ou-se

Stabilize `core::slice::fill`

Tracking issue rust-lang#70758

Stabilizes the `core::slice::fill` API in Rust 1.50, adding a `memset` doc alias so people coming from C/C++ looking for this operation can find it in the docs. This API hasn't seen any changes since we changed the signature in rust-lang#71165, and it seems like the right time to propose stabilization. Thanks!

r? ``@m-ou-se``
@Dylan-DPC
Rollup merge of rust-lang#80100 - mark-i-m:pattORns-2, r=petrochenkov
8822986 
or_patterns: implement :pat edition-specific behavior

cc rust-lang#54883 ``@joshtriplett``

This PR implements the edition-specific behavior of `:pat` wrt or-patterns, as determined by the crater runs and T-lang consensus in rust-lang#54883 (comment).

I believe this can unblock stabilization of or_patterns.

r? ``@petrochenkov``
@Dylan-DPC
Rollup merge of rust-lang#80123 - DrMeepster:maybe_uninit_write_slice…
9d5280a 
…, r=RalfJung

Fix memory leak in test "mem::uninit_write_slice_cloned_no_drop"

This fixes rust-lang#80116. I replaced the `Rc` based method I was using with a type that panics when dropped.
@Dylan-DPC
Rollup merge of rust-lang#80163 - jackh726:binder-refactor-part-3, r=…
e3aff77 
…lcnr

Make BoundRegion have a kind of BoungRegionKind

Split from rust-lang#76814

Also includes making `replace_escaping_bound_vars` only return `T`

Going to r? ```@lcnr```
Feel free to reassign
@Dylan-DPC
Rollup merge of rust-lang#80206 - poliorcetics:rustdoc-default-langst…
6af5e7a 
…ring, r=GuillaumeGomez,jyn514

impl Default for LangString, replacing all_false by default

Fix rust-lang#80015

``@rustbot`` label C-cleanup  T-rustdoc  A-markdown-parsing
@rustbot rustbot added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Dec 20, 2020
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

The job mingw-check failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot) 
    Checking miniz_oxide v0.4.0
    Checking hashbrown v0.9.0
    Checking object v0.22.0
    Checking addr2line v0.14.0
error: the feature `slice_fill` has been stable since 1.50.0 and no longer requires an attribute to enable
    |
    |
307 | #![feature(slice_fill)]
    |
    |
    = note: `-D stable-features` implied by `-D warnings`
error: aborting due to previous error

error: could not compile `std`


To learn more, run the command again with --verbose.
command did not execute successfully: "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0/bin/cargo" "check" "--target" "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" "-Zbinary-dep-depinfo" "-j" "16" "--release" "--color" "always" "--features" "panic-unwind backtrace compiler-builtins-c" "--manifest-path" "/checkout/library/test/Cargo.toml" "--message-format" "json-render-diagnostics"
failed to run: /checkout/obj/build/bootstrap/debug/bootstrap check
Build completed unsuccessfully in 0:01:40

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 21, 2020

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #80253) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

Note that reviewers usually do not review pull requests until merge conflicts are resolved! Once you resolve the conflicts, you should change the labels applied by bors to indicate that your PR is ready for review. Post this as a comment to change the labels:

@rustbot modify labels: +S-waiting-on-review -S-waiting-on-author

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. label Dec 21, 2020
@jyn514
Copy link
Member

jyn514 commented Dec 21, 2020

Most of these were merged.

@jyn514 jyn514 closed this Dec 21, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.