[WIP] rustc_span: Symbol perf experiments #80420

petrochenkov · 2020-12-27T20:16:16Z

cc #79425

rust-highfive · 2020-12-27T20:16:19Z

r? @varkor

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

petrochenkov · 2020-12-27T20:17:00Z

@bors try @rust-timer queue

rust-timer · 2020-12-27T20:17:02Z

Awaiting bors try build completion.

bors · 2020-12-27T20:17:11Z

⌛ Trying commit 8d21ca5460f295a97a5517b96dc19d278ef1e65d with merge f2658af4ef876e20781bd9d367daa3d4b5d56fef...

rust-log-analyzer · 2020-12-27T20:46:46Z

The job x86_64-gnu-llvm-9 failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

.................................................................................................... 9000/11195
.................................................................................................... 9100/11195
.....................................................................................i......i....... 9200/11195
.................................................................................................... 9300/11195
........................iiiiii..iiiiii.i............................................................ 9400/11195
.................................................................................................... 9600/11195
.................................................................................................... 9700/11195
.................................................................................................... 9800/11195
.................................................................................................... 9900/11195
---
Suite("src/test/assembly") not skipped for "bootstrap::test::Assembly" -- not in ["src/tools/tidy"]
Check compiletest suite=assembly mode=assembly (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)

running 27 tests
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
Suite("src/test/incremental") not skipped for "bootstrap::test::Incremental" -- not in ["src/tools/tidy"]

 finished in 0.079 seconds
Check compiletest suite=incremental mode=incremental (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
---
Suite("src/test/debuginfo") not skipped for "bootstrap::test::Debuginfo" -- not in ["src/tools/tidy"]
Check compiletest suite=debuginfo mode=debuginfo (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)

running 116 tests
iiiiiiiiii.i.i..i..i....ii...ii....ii..........iiii...........i...i...i.......ii.i.ii.....iiii.....i 100/116
test result: ok. 78 passed; 0 failed; 38 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 2.41s

 finished in 2.495 seconds
Suite("src/test/ui-fulldeps") not skipped for "bootstrap::test::UiFullDeps" -- not in ["src/tools/tidy"]
---
running 5 tests
FFF..
failures:

---- symbols::tests::check_dup_keywords stdout ----
thread 'symbols::tests::check_dup_keywords' panicked at 'duplicate key `"crate"`', /cargo/registry/src/github.com-1ecc6299db9ec823/phf_codegen-0.8.0/src/lib.rs:203:17
---- symbols::tests::check_dup_symbol_and_keyword stdout ----
---- symbols::tests::check_dup_symbol_and_keyword stdout ----
thread 'symbols::tests::check_dup_symbol_and_keyword' panicked at 'duplicate key `"splat"`', /cargo/registry/src/github.com-1ecc6299db9ec823/phf_codegen-0.8.0/src/lib.rs:203:17

---- symbols::tests::check_dup_symbol stdout ----
---- symbols::tests::check_dup_symbol stdout ----
thread 'symbols::tests::check_dup_symbol' panicked at 'duplicate key `"splat"`', /cargo/registry/src/github.com-1ecc6299db9ec823/phf_codegen-0.8.0/src/lib.rs:203:17

failures:
    symbols::tests::check_dup_keywords
    symbols::tests::check_dup_symbol
    symbols::tests::check_dup_symbol
    symbols::tests::check_dup_symbol_and_keyword

test result: FAILED. 2 passed; 3 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 1.02s

error: test failed, to rerun pass '-p rustc_macros --lib'


command did not execute successfully: "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0/bin/cargo" "test" "--target" "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" "-Zbinary-dep-depinfo" "-j" "16" "--release" "--locked" "--color" "always" "--features" " llvm" "--manifest-path" "/checkout/compiler/rustc/Cargo.toml" "-p" "rustc_macros" "--" "--quiet"


failed to run: /checkout/obj/build/bootstrap/debug/bootstrap --stage 2 test --exclude src/tools/tidy
Build completed unsuccessfully in 0:27:43

bors · 2020-12-27T21:17:30Z

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: f2658af4ef876e20781bd9d367daa3d4b5d56fef (f2658af4ef876e20781bd9d367daa3d4b5d56fef)

rust-timer · 2020-12-27T21:17:32Z

Queued f2658af4ef876e20781bd9d367daa3d4b5d56fef with parent 76188b6, future comparison URL.

@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf

rust-timer · 2020-12-27T22:55:07Z

Finished benchmarking try commit (f2658af4ef876e20781bd9d367daa3d4b5d56fef): comparison url.

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. Please note that if the perf results are neutral, you should likely undo the rollup=never given below by specifying rollup- to bors.

Importantly, though, if the results of this run are non-neutral do not roll this PR up -- it will mask other regressions or improvements in the roll up.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-review -S-waiting-on-perf

bjorn3 · 2020-12-28T07:15:31Z

Up to 3.7% slowdown.

petrochenkov · 2020-12-28T12:14:30Z

The results from slowing down Symbol::intern only (#80420 (comment)) are nearly identical to the results from the whole #79425 (#79425 (comment)), so the hypothesis in #79425 (comment) should be correct.

This means we either need a faster Symbol::static_intern, or a higher percent of hits in Symbol::static_intern to compensate for the potential second search.

petrochenkov · 2020-12-28T12:40:24Z

@bors try @rust-timer queue

rust-timer · 2020-12-28T12:40:25Z

Awaiting bors try build completion.

bors · 2020-12-28T12:40:34Z

⌛ Trying commit 7a85c533c293cd159937faf7e095848570a913d0 with merge 6d5202ee390b147711c841482f99201f2ee6ed58...

rust-log-analyzer · 2020-12-28T13:08:56Z

The job x86_64-gnu-llvm-9 failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

.................................................................................................... 9000/11195
.................................................................................................... 9100/11195
.....................................................................................i......i....... 9200/11195
.................................................................................................... 9300/11195
........................iiiiii..iiiiii.i............................................................ 9400/11195
.................................................................................................... 9600/11195
.................................................................................................... 9700/11195
.................................................................................................... 9800/11195
.................................................................................................... 9900/11195
---
Suite("src/test/assembly") not skipped for "bootstrap::test::Assembly" -- not in ["src/tools/tidy"]
Check compiletest suite=assembly mode=assembly (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)

running 27 tests
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii

 finished in 0.062 seconds
Suite("src/test/incremental") not skipped for "bootstrap::test::Incremental" -- not in ["src/tools/tidy"]
Check compiletest suite=incremental mode=incremental (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
---
Suite("src/test/debuginfo") not skipped for "bootstrap::test::Debuginfo" -- not in ["src/tools/tidy"]
Check compiletest suite=debuginfo mode=debuginfo (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)

running 116 tests
iiiiiiiiii.i.i..i..i..ii....i.i....ii..........iiii.........i.....i...i.......ii.i.ii.....iiii.....i 100/116
test result: ok. 78 passed; 0 failed; 38 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 2.33s

 finished in 2.394 seconds
Suite("src/test/ui-fulldeps") not skipped for "bootstrap::test::UiFullDeps" -- not in ["src/tools/tidy"]
---
running 5 tests
FFF..
failures:

---- symbols::tests::check_dup_symbol_and_keyword stdout ----
thread 'symbols::tests::check_dup_symbol_and_keyword' panicked at 'duplicate key `"splat"`', /cargo/registry/src/github.com-1ecc6299db9ec823/phf_codegen-0.8.0/src/lib.rs:203:17
---- symbols::tests::check_dup_keywords stdout ----
---- symbols::tests::check_dup_keywords stdout ----
thread 'symbols::tests::check_dup_keywords' panicked at 'duplicate key `"crate"`', /cargo/registry/src/github.com-1ecc6299db9ec823/phf_codegen-0.8.0/src/lib.rs:203:17
---- symbols::tests::check_dup_symbol stdout ----
---- symbols::tests::check_dup_symbol stdout ----
thread 'symbols::tests::check_dup_symbol' panicked at 'duplicate key `"splat"`', /cargo/registry/src/github.com-1ecc6299db9ec823/phf_codegen-0.8.0/src/lib.rs:203:17


failures:
    symbols::tests::check_dup_keywords
    symbols::tests::check_dup_keywords
    symbols::tests::check_dup_symbol
    symbols::tests::check_dup_symbol_and_keyword

test result: FAILED. 2 passed; 3 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 0.82s

error: test failed, to rerun pass '-p rustc_macros --lib'


command did not execute successfully: "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0/bin/cargo" "test" "--target" "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" "-Zbinary-dep-depinfo" "-j" "16" "--release" "--locked" "--color" "always" "--features" " llvm" "--manifest-path" "/checkout/compiler/rustc/Cargo.toml" "-p" "rustc_macros" "--" "--quiet"


failed to run: /checkout/obj/build/bootstrap/debug/bootstrap --stage 2 test --exclude src/tools/tidy
Build completed unsuccessfully in 0:26:08

bors · 2020-12-28T13:41:01Z

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 6d5202ee390b147711c841482f99201f2ee6ed58 (6d5202ee390b147711c841482f99201f2ee6ed58)

rust-timer · 2020-12-28T13:41:02Z

Queued 6d5202ee390b147711c841482f99201f2ee6ed58 with parent aef92d4, future comparison URL.

@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf

rust-timer · 2020-12-28T15:18:19Z

Finished benchmarking try commit (6d5202ee390b147711c841482f99201f2ee6ed58): comparison url.

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. Please note that if the perf results are neutral, you should likely undo the rollup=never given below by specifying rollup- to bors.

Importantly, though, if the results of this run are non-neutral do not roll this PR up -- it will mask other regressions or improvements in the roll up.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-review -S-waiting-on-perf

rust-timer · 2020-12-30T23:26:33Z

Queued 9552eb5d4fde685ead823b14a7ec197603502200 with parent e226704, future comparison URL.

@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf

rust-timer · 2020-12-31T04:10:51Z

Finished benchmarking try commit (9552eb5d4fde685ead823b14a7ec197603502200): comparison url.

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. Please note that if the perf results are neutral, you should likely undo the rollup=never given below by specifying rollup- to bors.

Importantly, though, if the results of this run are non-neutral do not roll this PR up -- it will mask other regressions or improvements in the roll up.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-review -S-waiting-on-perf

bjorn3 · 2020-12-31T08:47:40Z

Most changes are now within noise but overall it is a slight (<0.1%) improvement.

This reverts commit ae3ea6f3db2699f1943637198d459435ebf78e76.

petrochenkov · 2021-01-01T18:41:48Z

@bors try @rust-timer queue

rust-timer · 2021-01-01T18:41:50Z

Awaiting bors try build completion.

bors · 2021-01-01T18:41:58Z

⌛ Trying commit 8809118 with merge 5d62d7cb25649b110a890b314aa67bb788879011...

rust-log-analyzer · 2021-01-01T19:04:05Z

The job x86_64-gnu-llvm-9 failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

.................................................................................................... 9000/11238
.................................................................................................... 9100/11238
.................................................................................................... 9200/11238
..................................i......i.......................................................... 9300/11238
.........................................................................iiiiii..iiiiii.i........... 9400/11238
.................................................................................................... 9600/11238
.................................................................................................... 9700/11238
.................................................................................................... 9800/11238
.................................................................................................... 9900/11238
---
Suite("src/test/assembly") not skipped for "bootstrap::test::Assembly" -- not in ["src/tools/tidy"]
Check compiletest suite=assembly mode=assembly (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)

running 27 tests
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii

Suite("src/test/incremental") not skipped for "bootstrap::test::Incremental" -- not in ["src/tools/tidy"]
 finished in 0.097 seconds
Check compiletest suite=incremental mode=incremental (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
---
Suite("src/test/debuginfo") not skipped for "bootstrap::test::Debuginfo" -- not in ["src/tools/tidy"]
Check compiletest suite=debuginfo mode=debuginfo (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)

running 116 tests
iiiiiiiiii.i.i..i...i.ii....i.i....ii...........iiii........i.....i...i.......ii.i.ii.....iiii.....i 100/116
test result: ok. 78 passed; 0 failed; 38 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 2.42s

 finished in 2.502 seconds
Suite("src/test/ui-fulldeps") not skipped for "bootstrap::test::UiFullDeps" -- not in ["src/tools/tidy"]
---

   Doc-tests alloc

running 540 tests
double free or corruption (!prev)
error: test failed, to rerun pass '--doc'


command did not execute successfully: "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0/bin/cargo" "test" "--target" "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" "-Zbinary-dep-depinfo" "-j" "16" "--release" "--locked" "--color" "always" "--features" "panic-unwind backtrace compiler-builtins-c" "--manifest-path" "/checkout/library/test/Cargo.toml" "-p" "alloc" "--" "--quiet"


failed to run: /checkout/obj/build/bootstrap/debug/bootstrap --stage 2 test --exclude src/tools/tidy
Build completed unsuccessfully in 0:19:57

bors · 2021-01-01T19:42:26Z

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 5d62d7cb25649b110a890b314aa67bb788879011 (5d62d7cb25649b110a890b314aa67bb788879011)

rust-timer · 2021-01-01T19:42:28Z

Queued 5d62d7cb25649b110a890b314aa67bb788879011 with parent a609fb4, future comparison URL.

@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf

rust-timer · 2021-01-01T21:31:15Z

Finished benchmarking try commit (5d62d7cb25649b110a890b314aa67bb788879011): comparison url.

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. Please note that if the perf results are neutral, you should likely undo the rollup=never given below by specifying rollup- to bors.

Importantly, though, if the results of this run are non-neutral do not roll this PR up -- it will mask other regressions or improvements in the roll up.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-review -S-waiting-on-perf

rust-highfive assigned varkor Dec 27, 2020

rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Dec 27, 2020

petrochenkov added S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 27, 2020

petrochenkov mentioned this pull request Dec 27, 2020

Split symbol interner into static unsynchronized and dynamic synchronized parts #79425

Closed

Mark-Simulacrum assigned petrochenkov and unassigned varkor Dec 27, 2020

rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. labels Dec 27, 2020

petrochenkov added S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 28, 2020

rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Dec 30, 2020

petrochenkov removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 31, 2020

rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. labels Dec 31, 2020

petrochenkov added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 31, 2020

petrochenkov added 7 commits January 1, 2021 21:00

rustc_span: Symbol perf experiments

5b94342

Slow down Symbol::as_str

5d192a4

Revert "Slow down Symbol::as_str"

f7eabf5

This reverts commit ae3ea6f3db2699f1943637198d459435ebf78e76.

Double the number of static symbols

bbaac07

Double the number of static symbols again

351843f

Compare string search performance of phf::Map and FxHashMap

616633f

Avoid double hashing by using raw entry APIs

8809118

petrochenkov force-pushed the bettersyms2 branch from f35dd6c to 8809118 Compare January 1, 2021 18:41

rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Jan 1, 2021

rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. labels Jan 1, 2021

petrochenkov closed this Jan 1, 2021

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

[WIP] rustc_span: Symbol perf experiments #80420

[WIP] rustc_span: Symbol perf experiments #80420

petrochenkov commented Dec 27, 2020

rust-highfive commented Dec 27, 2020

petrochenkov commented Dec 27, 2020

rust-timer commented Dec 27, 2020

bors commented Dec 27, 2020

rust-log-analyzer commented Dec 27, 2020

bors commented Dec 27, 2020

rust-timer commented Dec 27, 2020

rust-timer commented Dec 27, 2020

bjorn3 commented Dec 28, 2020

petrochenkov commented Dec 28, 2020

petrochenkov commented Dec 28, 2020

rust-timer commented Dec 28, 2020

bors commented Dec 28, 2020

rust-log-analyzer commented Dec 28, 2020

bors commented Dec 28, 2020

rust-timer commented Dec 28, 2020

rust-timer commented Dec 28, 2020

rust-timer commented Dec 30, 2020

rust-timer commented Dec 31, 2020

bjorn3 commented Dec 31, 2020

petrochenkov commented Jan 1, 2021

rust-timer commented Jan 1, 2021

bors commented Jan 1, 2021

rust-log-analyzer commented Jan 1, 2021

bors commented Jan 1, 2021

rust-timer commented Jan 1, 2021

rust-timer commented Jan 1, 2021

[WIP] rustc_span: Symbol perf experiments #80420

[WIP] rustc_span: Symbol perf experiments #80420

Conversation

petrochenkov commented Dec 27, 2020

rust-highfive commented Dec 27, 2020

petrochenkov commented Dec 27, 2020

rust-timer commented Dec 27, 2020

bors commented Dec 27, 2020

rust-log-analyzer commented Dec 27, 2020

bors commented Dec 27, 2020

rust-timer commented Dec 27, 2020

rust-timer commented Dec 27, 2020

bjorn3 commented Dec 28, 2020

petrochenkov commented Dec 28, 2020

petrochenkov commented Dec 28, 2020

rust-timer commented Dec 28, 2020

bors commented Dec 28, 2020

rust-log-analyzer commented Dec 28, 2020

bors commented Dec 28, 2020

rust-timer commented Dec 28, 2020

rust-timer commented Dec 28, 2020

rust-timer commented Dec 30, 2020

rust-timer commented Dec 31, 2020

bjorn3 commented Dec 31, 2020

petrochenkov commented Jan 1, 2021

rust-timer commented Jan 1, 2021

bors commented Jan 1, 2021

rust-log-analyzer commented Jan 1, 2021

bors commented Jan 1, 2021

rust-timer commented Jan 1, 2021

rust-timer commented Jan 1, 2021