Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Coveralls: Try updating to default suggestion #133

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 6, 2023

Conversation

ntjohnson1
Copy link
Collaborator

@ntjohnson1 ntjohnson1 commented Jun 6, 2023

Following the coveralls python package suggestion here seems to resolve our issues with weird coverage in our github action. https://coveralls-python.readthedocs.io/en/latest/usage/configuration.html#github-actions-support

NOTE: Do we use the sphinx_rtd_theme anywhere for our current testing/deployment? I don't think so. If we do we should probably update our automation to pip install .[dev,doc] instead of manually specifiying the theme (manually specifying coveralls since that is only for the action makes sense still). But that's more energy than I have for this tonight.

@ntjohnson1 ntjohnson1 marked this pull request as ready for review June 6, 2023 00:56
@ntjohnson1 ntjohnson1 requested a review from dmdunla June 6, 2023 00:56
@ntjohnson1
Copy link
Collaborator Author

If I understand correctly the issues we were seeing before had to do with the coveralls github action and package itself rather than any of our source code. I still think it is probably good practice for us to have a little more specificity on our pacakage dependencies but that doesn't appear to be the cause of the bug we saw with our coverage

@dmdunla dmdunla merged commit f83b6ee into sandialabs:main Jun 6, 2023
@ntjohnson1 ntjohnson1 deleted the coveralls_debug branch June 9, 2023 13:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants