Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Set aggregation method for newer event loop metrics #422

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 31, 2021

Conversation

zbjornson
Copy link
Collaborator

These are not entirely accurate: they're the "mean of the mean" and "mean of percentiles," but that's as good as we can get.

No tests added - doesn't seem worth asserting that these properties are set.

Fixes #418

@mkreidenweis-schulmngr
Copy link

As you're saying, the aggregation method isn't ideal. For the mean it should actually be fine, as the sample size should actually be the same for all cluster nodes, right? Maybe you want to add a short note about these concerns to the respective Readme section to set the right expectations.

These are not entirely accurate: they're the "mean of the mean" and "mean of percentiles," but that's as good as we can get.

Fixes siimon#418
@zbjornson zbjornson merged commit a972f0c into siimon:master Jul 31, 2021
@zbjornson zbjornson deleted the zb/418 branch July 31, 2021 17:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Advanced event loop monitoring not aggregated correctly across cluster
2 participants