Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support PolarisRegistryConfiguration #1291

Conversation

wangchengming666
Copy link
Contributor

Support PolarisRegistryConfiguration

Copy link
Contributor

@HzjNeverStop HzjNeverStop left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 27, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 83.13%. Comparing base (92efd61) to head (e19c070).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #1291      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     83.09%   83.13%   +0.03%     
- Complexity     2943     2950       +7     
============================================
  Files           331      333       +2     
  Lines          9659     9669      +10     
  Branches       1168     1168              
============================================
+ Hits           8026     8038      +12     
  Misses         1123     1123              
+ Partials        510      508       -2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@HzjNeverStop HzjNeverStop merged commit 447b919 into sofastack:master Feb 27, 2024
5 checks passed
@wangchengming666 wangchengming666 deleted the support-PolarisRegistryConfiguration branch February 27, 2024 08:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants