Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update pricing page #66

Closed
wants to merge 6 commits into from
Closed

Update pricing page #66

wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

francisschmaltz
Copy link
Contributor

@francisschmaltz francisschmaltz commented Dec 5, 2018

@dadlerj Updated pricing page. Thoughts?

screen shot 2018-12-07 at 11 18 08 am
screen shot 2018-12-07 at 11 18 35 am
screen shot 2018-12-07 at 11 18 52 am

@dadlerj
Copy link
Member

dadlerj commented Dec 5, 2018

Looks great! Thanks for putting it together so fast. Could you also add "Limited starter package available" to the bottom of the Enterprise column, with a link to the contact form page if you click it? Or some text like that?

Looks like we could make these wider and potentially get "registry" onto the first line :)

@francisschmaltz
Copy link
Contributor Author

Could you also add "Limited starter package available" to the bottom of the Enterprise column, with a link to the contact form page if you click it?

We already have a free trial button that takes the user to the contact page. We could add copy on there if you wanted.

Looks like we could make these wider and potentially get "registry" onto the first line :)

I wanted to but it looks odd at a wider frame.

@dadlerj
Copy link
Member

dadlerj commented Dec 5, 2018

We already have a free trial button that takes the user to the contact page. We could add copy on there if you wanted.

Is your reticence to add it because that would cause the number of lines on the two cards to look imbalanced? I'm debating whether to remove one of the other lines if so (or if there's some other way to get "registry" onto a single line :) )

@sqs
Copy link
Member

sqs commented Dec 5, 2018

  • "HA cluster support" - Customers don't care about HA nearly as much as they do about high scalability. I know this is on there now, but we should change it. It should be "High-scale cluster support (Kubernetes)"
  • "SSO Support" - "S" in "Support" should be lowercase
  • The "for 200 users" is small. I missed it initially even when I was looking for it.

@francisschmaltz
Copy link
Contributor Author

Is your reticence to add it because that would cause the number of lines on the two cards to look imbalanced?

The lines can always be balanced with more added. I thought you meant adding a link elsewhere, which I thought was redundant. If it's just a block of text then I'm okay with it – it just wouldn't be a link.

The "for 200 users" is small. I missed it initially even when I was looking for it.

On the site it's still visible enough for someone looking for information for the first time.

@dadlerj
Copy link
Member

dadlerj commented Dec 5, 2018

The lines can always be balanced with more added. I thought you meant adding a link elsewhere, which I thought was redundant. If it's just a block of text then I'm okay with it – it just wouldn't be a link.

Ah, nope! I just wanted to add an extra line to the features list with that text. LMK if that sounds doable.

@francisschmaltz
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dadlerj are you okay having the limited start pack in the sosumi copy below?
screen shot 2018-12-07 at 11 21 37 am

@francisschmaltz
Copy link
Contributor Author

Mobile screenshots. Changed button to block buttons on mobile.
screen shot 2018-12-07 at 11 53 34 am
screen shot 2018-12-07 at 11 53 40 am
screen shot 2018-12-07 at 11 53 51 am

@dadlerj dadlerj mentioned this pull request Jan 3, 2019
@dadlerj dadlerj closed this Jan 3, 2019
@sqs sqs deleted the fs/update-pricing branch November 11, 2019 10:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants