Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: provider spec revamp #107

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jan 31, 2024
Merged

feat: provider spec revamp #107

merged 6 commits into from
Jan 31, 2024

Conversation

Gozala
Copy link
Collaborator

@Gozala Gozala commented Jan 26, 2024

No description provided.

@Gozala Gozala requested a review from travis January 26, 2024 08:19
Copy link
Contributor

@travis travis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Protocol makes sense to me! Looking forward to moving us fully over to it, this is much clearer than our current system, imho. Lots of copy editing here and a few requests for clarification, but I think this is generally good to ship once the copy editing is incorporated.

w3-provider.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
w3-provider.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
w3-provider.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
w3-provider.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
w3-provider.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
w3-provider.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
w3-provider.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
w3-provider.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
w3-provider.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
w3-provider.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
w3-provider.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
w3-provider.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
w3-provider.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
w3-provider.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@Gozala Gozala merged commit 8108999 into main Jan 31, 2024
2 checks passed
@Gozala Gozala deleted the feat/provider-revamp branch January 31, 2024 17:10
hannahhoward added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2024
hannahhoward added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2024
# Goals

This PR reverts #107 

Why? The spec currently diverges wildly from the implementation, and
there are no immediate plans to implement the revised version.

We can absolutely return to this once we have immediate plans for
implementation. Generally, the specs should match exactly the
implementation, or there should be notes as to why.

I don't know the history and rationale for the revamp, but for now, it's
a huge source of confusion.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants