ci: Try to fix cache failures when running GH actions

[bellini666]

• Make env.pythonLocation as part of the cache key, as suggested by [GitHub Action] python is not installed into the virtualenv wntrblm/nox#735 (comment)
• Remove the generic option from restore cache to avoid the same issues we had before
• Use uv as the default venv backend for a performance improvement when installing packages (updated nox for this)
• Remove strategy: fail-fast in some places where we are not using matrix, and thus this was not doing anything

Summary by Sourcery

Improve GitHub Actions caching by incorporating env.pythonLocation into the cache key and removing unnecessary restore cache options. Enhance performance by setting uv as the default venv backend in nox and streamline CI configuration by removing redundant fail-fast strategies.

Enhancements:

• Set uv as the default virtual environment backend in nox for improved package installation performance.

CI:

• Include env.pythonLocation in the cache key to address cache failures in GitHub Actions.
• Remove the generic restore cache option to prevent previous cache issues.
• Remove strategy: fail-fast from jobs that do not use a matrix, as it was redundant.

[sourcery-ai]

🧙 Sourcery has finished reviewing your pull request!

---

Tips

• Trigger a new Sourcery review by commenting @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue your discussion with Sourcery by replying directly to review comments.
• You can change your review settings at any time by accessing your dashboard:
  • Enable or disable the Sourcery-generated pull request summary or reviewer's guide;
  • Change the review language;
• You can always contact us if you have any questions or feedback.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @bellini666 - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟢 General issues: all looks good
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.59%. Comparing base (cafc388) to head (923a530).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3604      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   93.86%   96.59%   +2.72%     
==========================================
  Files         522      526       +4     
  Lines       32870    34028    +1158     
  Branches     3753     5627    +1874     
==========================================
+ Hits        30854    32869    +2015     
+ Misses       1719      922     -797     
+ Partials      297      237      -60     

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #3604 will not alter performance

_{Comparing fix_gh_actions_cache_failures (923a530) with main (cafc388)}

Summary

✅ 15 untouched benchmarks

[botberry]

Apollo Federation Subgraph Compatibility Results

Federation 1 Support	Federation 2 Support
_service 🟢 @key (single) 🟢 @key (multi) 🟢 @key (composite) 🟢 repeatable @key 🟢 @requires 🟢 @provides 🟢 federated tracing 🔲	@link 🟢 @shareable 🟢 @tag 🟢 @override 🟢 @inaccessible 🟢 @composeDirective 🟢 @interfaceObject 🟢

Learn more:

• Apollo Federation Subgraph Specification
• Compatibility Tests

[bellini666]

@sourcery-ai review

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @bellini666 - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟢 General issues: all looks good
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.}

[sourcery-ai]

We have skipped reviewing this pull request. It looks like we've already reviewed the commit 0b7e5a1 in this pull request.

[botberry]

Hi, thanks for contributing to Strawberry 🍓!

We noticed that this PR is missing a RELEASE.md file. We use that to automatically do releases here on GitHub and, most importantly, to PyPI!

So as soon as this PR is merged, a release will be made 🚀.

Here's an example of RELEASE.md:

Release type: patch

Description of the changes, ideally with some examples, if adding a new feature.

Release type can be one of patch, minor or major. We use semver, so make sure to pick the appropriate type. If in doubt feel free to ask :)

Here's the tweet text:

🆕 Release (next) is out! Thanks to @_bellini666 for the PR 👏

Get it here 👉 https://strawberry.rocks/release/(next)

[patrick91]

@bellini666 looks like it is an issue with the latest version of starlette 🤔