Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update tfjs to 0.0.5, which depends on tfjs-core 0.0.2 #12

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 20, 2018

Conversation

dsmilkov
Copy link
Contributor

@dsmilkov dsmilkov commented Mar 20, 2018

This change is Reviewable

@dsmilkov dsmilkov requested review from nsthorat and caisq March 20, 2018 18:05
@dsmilkov dsmilkov changed the title Update tfjs to depend on tfjs-core 0.0.2 Update tfjs to 0.0.5, which depends on tfjs-core 0.0.2 Mar 20, 2018
@nsthorat
Copy link
Contributor

:lgtm_strong:


Review status: 0 of 4 files reviewed at latest revision, 1 unresolved discussion.


scripts/publish-npm.sh, line 29 at r1 (raw file):

set -e

BRANCH=`git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD`

can we check the origin too?

git config --get remote.origin.url



---


*Comments from [Reviewable](https://reviewable.io:443/reviews/tensorflow/tfjs/12#-:-L83aa2CnDys5TDk_ZB8:b-jbsf8z)*
<!-- Sent from Reviewable.io -->

@dsmilkov
Copy link
Contributor Author

Review status: 0 of 4 files reviewed at latest revision, 1 unresolved discussion, all commit checks successful.


scripts/publish-npm.sh, line 29 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, nsthorat (Nikhil Thorat) wrote…

can we check the origin too?

git config --get remote.origin.url

Done.


Comments from Reviewable

@dsmilkov dsmilkov merged commit e68a66a into master Mar 20, 2018
@dsmilkov dsmilkov deleted the update-version branch March 20, 2018 20:19
nsthorat pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 19, 2019
* Convert all assertions to actual JS messages and cleanup logging.

* Change description of constructor test.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants