Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency containers/podman to v4.9.0 #2677

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 23, 2024

Conversation

uniget-bot
Copy link

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Update Change
containers/podman minor 4.8.3 -> 4.9.0

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.


Release Notes

containers/podman (containers/podman)

v4.9.0

Compare Source

Features
  • The podman farm suite of commands for multi-architecture builds is now fully enabled and documented.
  • Add a network recovery service to Podman Machine VMs using the QEMU backend to detect and recover from an inoperable host networking issues experienced by Mac users when running for long periods of time.
Bugfixes
  • Fixed a bug where the HyperV provider for podman machine did not forward the API socket to the host machine.
  • Fixed a bug where improperly formatted annotations passed to podman kube play could cause Podman to panic.
  • Fixed a bug where podman system reset could fail if non-Podman containers (e.g. containers created by Buildah) were present.
Misc
  • Containers run in podman machine VMs now default to a PID limit of unlimited, instead of 2048.

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

Copy link

@nicholasdille-bot nicholasdille-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Auto-approved because label type/renovate is present.

Copy link

🔍 Vulnerabilities of ghcr.io/uniget-org/tools/podman:4.9.0

📦 Image Reference ghcr.io/uniget-org/tools/podman:4.9.0
digestsha256:8b725b0d0b776bc337050d7e69d95c596c4329151d35055c4e3fcccd7200f886
vulnerabilitiescritical: 0 high: 1 medium: 4 low: 1 unspecified: 1
platformlinux/amd64
size33 MB
packages168
critical: 0 high: 1 medium: 2 low: 1 github.com/opencontainers/runc 1.1.1-0.20230904132852-a0466dd76f23 (golang)

pkg:golang/github.com/opencontainers/runc@1.1.1-0.20230904132852-a0466dd76f23

high 7.0: CVE--2023--27561 OWASP Top Ten 2017 Category A9 - Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities

Affected range<=v1.1.4
Fixed versionNot Fixed
CVSS Score7
CVSS VectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

runc through 1.1.4 has Incorrect Access Control leading to Escalation of Privileges, related to libcontainer/rootfs_linux.go. To exploit this, an attacker must be able to spawn two containers with custom volume-mount configurations, and be able to run custom images. NOTE: this issue exists because of a CVE-2019-19921 regression.

medium 6.1: CVE--2023--28642 Improper Preservation of Permissions

Affected range<1.1.5
Fixed version1.1.5
CVSS Score6.1
CVSS VectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

Impact

It was found that AppArmor, and potentially SELinux, can be bypassed when /proc inside the container is symlinked with a specific mount configuration.

Patches

Fixed in runc v1.1.5, by prohibiting symlinked /proc: opencontainers/runc#3785

This PR fixes CVE-2023-27561 as well.

Workarounds

Avoid using an untrusted container image.

medium 5.9: CVE--2022--29162 Incorrect Default Permissions

Affected range<1.1.2
Fixed version1.1.2
CVSS Score5.9
CVSS VectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

Impact

A bug was found in runc where runc exec --cap executed processes with non-empty inheritable Linux process capabilities, creating an atypical Linux environment and enabling programs with inheritable file capabilities to elevate those capabilities to the permitted set during execve(2).

This bug did not affect the container security sandbox as the inheritable set never contained more capabilities than were included in the container's bounding set.

Patches

This bug has been fixed in runc 1.1.2. Users should update to this version as soon as possible.

This fix changes runc exec --cap behavior such that the additional capabilities granted to the process being executed (as specified via --cap arguments) do not include inheritable capabilities.

In addition, runc spec is changed to not set any inheritable capabilities in the created example OCI spec (config.json) file.

Credits

The opencontainers project would like to thank Andrew G. Morgan for responsibly disclosing this issue in accordance with the opencontainers org security policy.

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:

low 2.5: CVE--2023--25809 Improper Preservation of Permissions

Affected range<1.1.5
Fixed version1.1.5
CVSS Score2.5
CVSS VectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

Impact

It was found that rootless runc makes /sys/fs/cgroup writable in following conditons:

  1. when runc is executed inside the user namespace, and the config.json does not specify the cgroup namespace to be unshared (e.g.., (docker|podman|nerdctl) run --cgroupns=host, with Rootless Docker/Podman/nerdctl)
  2. or, when runc is executed outside the user namespace, and /sys is mounted with rbind, ro (e.g., runc spec --rootless; this condition is very rare)

A container may gain the write access to user-owned cgroup hierarchy /sys/fs/cgroup/user.slice/... on the host .
Other users's cgroup hierarchies are not affected.

Patches

v1.1.5 (planned)

Workarounds

  • Condition 1: Unshare the cgroup namespace ((docker|podman|nerdctl) run --cgroupns=private). This is the default behavior of Docker/Podman/nerdctl on cgroup v2 hosts.
  • Condition 2 (very rare): add /sys/fs/cgroup to maskedPaths
critical: 0 high: 0 medium: 1 low: 0 unspecified: 1github.com/containerd/containerd 1.7.9 (golang)

pkg:golang/github.com/containerd/containerd@1.7.9

medium : GHSA--7ww5--4wqc--m92c

Affected range>=1.7.0
<=1.7.10
Fixed version1.7.11
Description

/sys/devices/virtual/powercap accessible by default to containers

Intel's RAPL (Running Average Power Limit) feature, introduced by the Sandy Bridge microarchitecture, provides software insights into hardware energy consumption. To facilitate this, Intel introduced the powercap framework in Linux kernel 3.13, which reads values via relevant MSRs (model specific registers) and provides unprivileged userspace access via sysfs. As RAPL is an interface to access a hardware feature, it is only available when running on bare metal with the module compiled into the kernel.

By 2019, it was realized that in some cases unprivileged access to RAPL readings could be exploited as a power-based side-channel against security features including AES-NI (potentially inside a SGX enclave) and KASLR (kernel address space layout randomization). Also known as the PLATYPUS attack, Intel assigned CVE-2020-8694 and CVE-2020-8695, and AMD assigned CVE-2020-12912.

Several mitigations were applied; Intel reduced the sampling resolution via a microcode update, and the Linux kernel prevents access by non-root users since 5.10. However, this kernel-based mitigation does not apply to many container-based scenarios:

  • Unless using user namespaces, root inside a container has the same level of privilege as root outside the container, but with a slightly more narrow view of the system
  • sysfs is mounted inside containers read-only; however only read access is needed to carry out this attack on an unpatched CPU

While this is not a direct vulnerability in container runtimes, defense in depth and safe defaults are valuable and preferred, especially as this poses a risk to multi-tenant container environments. This is provided by masking /sys/devices/virtual/powercap in the default mount configuration, and adding an additional set of rules to deny it in the default AppArmor profile.

While sysfs is not the only way to read from the RAPL subsystem, other ways of accessing it require additional capabilities such as CAP_SYS_RAWIO which is not available to containers by default, or perf paranoia level less than 1, which is a non-default kernel tunable.

References

unspecified : GMS--2023--6564 OWASP Top Ten 2017 Category A9 - Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities

Affected range>=1.7.0
<=1.7.10
Fixed version1.6.26, 1.7.11
Description

/sys/devices/virtual/powercap accessible by default to containers

Intel's RAPL (Running Average Power Limit) feature, introduced by the Sandy Bridge microarchitecture, provides software insights into hardware energy consumption. To facilitate this, Intel introduced the powercap framework in Linux kernel 3.13, which reads values via relevant MSRs (model specific registers) and provides unprivileged userspace access via sysfs. As RAPL is an interface to access a hardware feature, it is only available when running on bare metal with the module compiled into the kernel.

By 2019, it was realized that in some cases unprivileged access to RAPL readings could be exploited as a power-based side-channel against security features including AES-NI (potentially inside a SGX enclave) and KASLR (kernel address space layout randomization). Also known as the PLATYPUS attack, Intel assigned CVE-2020-8694 and CVE-2020-8695, and AMD assigned CVE-2020-12912.

Several mitigations were applied; Intel reduced the sampling resolution via a microcode update, and the Linux kernel prevents access by non-root users since 5.10. However, this kernel-based mitigation does not apply to many container-based scenarios:

  • Unless using user namespaces, root inside a container has the same level of privilege as root outside the container, but with a slightly more narrow view of the system
  • sysfs is mounted inside containers read-only; however only read access is needed to carry out this attack on an unpatched CPU

While this is not a direct vulnerability in container runtimes, defense in depth and safe defaults are valuable and preferred, especially as this poses a risk to multi-tenant container environments. This is provided by masking /sys/devices/virtual/powercap in the default mount configuration, and adding an additional set of rules to deny it in the default AppArmor profile.

While sysfs is not the only way to read from the RAPL subsystem, other ways of accessing it require additional capabilities such as CAP_SYS_RAWIO which is not available to containers by default, or perf paranoia level less than 1, which is a non-default kernel tunable.

References

critical: 0 high: 0 medium: 1 low: 0 k8s.io/kubernetes 1.28.4 (golang)

pkg:golang/k8s.io/kubernetes@1.28.4

medium 6.5: CVE--2019--11255 OWASP Top Ten 2017 Category A9 - Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities

Affected range>1.16
Fixed version1.16
CVSS Score6.5
CVSS VectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper input validation in Kubernetes CSI sidecar containers for external-provisioner (<v0.4.3, <v1.0.2, v1.1, <v1.2.2, <v1.3.1), external-snapshotter (<v0.4.2, <v1.0.2, v1.1, <1.2.2), and external-resizer (v0.1, v0.2) could result in unauthorized PersistentVolume data access or volume mutation during snapshot, restore from snapshot, cloning and resizing operations.

Copy link

Attempting automerge. See https://github.com/uniget-org/tools/actions/runs/7619834514.

Copy link

PR is clean and can be merged. See https://github.com/uniget-org/tools/actions/runs/7619834514.

@github-actions github-actions bot merged commit 6a6a1c7 into main Jan 23, 2024
8 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the renovate/containers-podman-4.x branch January 23, 2024 01:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants