feat(isIBAN): add isIBAN feature #1034
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
check if the string is IBAN number, (locale is one of ['AD','AT','BH','BE','BA','BG','CY','CZ','DE','DK','EE','FO','FI','FR','GB','GE','GI','GL','GR','HU','HR','IE','IS','IT',TN] OR defaults to 'any'. If 'any' or a falsey value is used, function will check if any of the locales match with the first two letters of the IBAN which coincide with the country Alpha-2 code name).
profnandaa
reviewed
Jun 13, 2019
| @@ -72,87 +72,88 @@ Thank you to the people who have already contributed: | |||
|
|
|||
| Here is a list of the validators currently available. | |||
|
|
|||
| Validator | Description | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For better diffing, just change the section involving isIBAN as opposed to reformatting the whole README.
| @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ function _interopRequireDefault(obj) { return obj && obj.__esModule ? obj : { de | |||
| var phones = { | |||
| 'ar-AE': /^((\+?971)|0)?5[024568]\d{7}$/, | |||
| 'ar-DZ': /^(\+?213|0)(5|6|7)\d{8}$/, | |||
| 'ar-EG': /^((\+?20)|0)?1[012]\d{8}$/, | |||
| 'ar-EG': /^((\+?20)|0)?1[0125]\d{8}$/, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Same here, separate out this and the change on L51 in a different PR.
| @@ -15,7 +15,8 @@ function test(options) { | |||
| if (validator[options.validator](...args) !== true) { | |||
| let warning = format( | |||
| 'validator.%s(%s) failed but should have passed', | |||
| options.validator, args.join(', ') | |||
| options.validator, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Also unstage all the unrelated linting on this file for the time being.
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test({ | ||
| validator: 'isMobilePhone', | ||
| validator: 'isIBAN', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The diff here is a little off because of the extra linting done. It should be okay if you just add the isIBAN tests without linting the file.
profnandaa
added
🧹 needs-update
ezkemboi
added a commit
to ezkemboi/validator.js
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 11, 2019
- fix linter issues - fix tests - seperate unnecessary files changes - closes validatorjs#1034 validatorjs#951 - Other references validatorjs#1071
Closed
ezkemboi
added a commit
to ezkemboi/validator.js
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 11, 2019
- fix linter issues - fix tests - seperate unnecessary files changes - closes validatorjs#1034 validatorjs#951 - Other references validatorjs#1071
ezkemboi
added a commit
to ezkemboi/validator.js
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 11, 2019
- fix linter issues - fix tests - seperate unnecessary files changes - closes validatorjs#1034 validatorjs#951 - Other references validatorjs#1071
ezkemboi
added a commit
to ezkemboi/validator.js
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 11, 2019
- fix linter issues - fix tests - seperate unnecessary files changes - closes validatorjs#1034 validatorjs#951 - Other references validatorjs#1071
|
Closing since there's a clean-up PR raised. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hello,
I added a feature to check the validity of an IBAN number: isIBAN.
To check the IBAN I verify if it corresponds to the structure of each country. Then I make the calculation to validate it according to the ISO 7064 (algorithms for calculating check digit characters.) by performing a basic mod-97 operation :
Check that the total IBAN length is correct as per the country. If not, the IBAN is invalid
Move the four initial characters to the end of the string
Replace each letter in the string with two digits, thereby expanding the string, where A = 10, ..., Z = 35
Interpret the string as a decimal integer and compute the remainder of that number on division by 97
If the remainder is 1, the check digit test is passed and the IBAN might be valid.
N.B: the maximum length of an IBAN is equal to 34 characters and usual computer can't handle calculations using integers of more than 20 digits that's why I used a step by step calculations :
Starting from the leftmost digit, construct a number using the first 9 digits and calculate its mod 97
Construct a new 9-digit by concatenating above the result with the next 7 digits (or less)
Repeat until all the digits have been processed
Ressources:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Bank_Account_Number : for the global structure and the calculation
https://bank.codes/iban/structure/ : for each IBAN country structure and IBAN numbers used in the testing
related to #951