Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "[WPT] BFCache: service worker clients" #34460

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 16, 2022

Conversation

chromium-wpt-export-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@chromium-wpt-export-bot chromium-wpt-export-bot commented Jun 15, 2022

This reverts commit 756b8281b5b76b2ae4561d3cf8c29a46689cf23f.

Reason for revert: New tests are very flaky. Example:
https://analysis.chromium.org/p/chromium/flake-portal/flakes/occurrences?key=ag9zfmZpbmRpdC1mb3ItbWVylgELEgVGbGFrZSKKAWNocm9taXVtQGJsaW5rX3dlYl90ZXN0c0BleHRlcm5hbC93cHQvaHRtbC9icm93c2Vycy9icm93c2luZy10aGUtd2ViL2JhY2stZm9yd2FyZC1jYWNoZS9zZXJ2aWNlLXdvcmtlci1jb250cm9sbGVkLWFmdGVyLXJlc3RvcmUuaHR0cHMuaHRtbAw

https://analysis.chromium.org/p/chromium/flake-portal/flakes/occurrences?key=ag9zfmZpbmRpdC1mb3ItbWVyjgELEgVGbGFrZSKCAWNocm9taXVtQGJsaW5rX3dlYl90ZXN0c0BleHRlcm5hbC93cHQvaHRtbC9icm93c2Vycy9icm93c2luZy10aGUtd2ViL2JhY2stZm9yd2FyZC1jYWNoZS9zZXJ2aWNlLXdvcmtlci1jbGllbnRzLW1hdGNoYWxsLmh0dHBzLmh0bWwM

Original change's description:

[WPT] BFCache: service worker clients

This CL adds service worker tests for BFCache:

  • navigator.serviceWorker.controller
  • Fetch interception
  • Clients.claim()
  • Clients.matchAll() and
  • unregister().

Expected behavior:

  • Controlled pages should remain controlled after
    restored from BFCache, i.e.
    navigator.serviceWorker.controller should remain non-null
    and fetch should be intercepted.
  • Clients.claim() should evict pages
    that would be affected from BFCache.
  • Clients.matchAll() shouldn't list pages in BFCache.
  • unregister() should evict controlled pages from BFCache.

Failing tests:

  • service-worker-clients-claim.https.html:
    On Safari/Firefox, Clients.claim() doesn't evict pages from BFCache.
  • service-worker-controlled-after-restore.https.html:
    On Firefox, fetches are not intercepted after restored from
    BFCache while navigator.serviceWorker.controller is non-null.
  • service-worker-unregister.https.html:
    Controlled pages aren't evicted by unregister() (all browsers).

Bug: 1107415, 1204228, w3c/ServiceWorker#1594
Change-Id: I73233cf917e31dd91b974823d5490d0190f0eade
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/3201011
Reviewed-by: Rakina Zata Amni <rakina@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ben Kelly <wanderview@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Hiroshige Hayashizaki <hiroshige@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#1008327}

Bug: 1107415, 1204228, w3c/ServiceWorker#1594
Change-Id: I56ac20a492e2b1716d27867dc9c113b097833a6c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/3708190
Bot-Commit: Rubber Stamper <rubber-stamper@appspot.gserviceaccount.com>
Owners-Override: Phillis Tang <phillis@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Phillis Tang <phillis@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Phillis Tang <phillis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#1014735}

Copy link
Collaborator

@wpt-pr-bot wpt-pr-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The review process for this patch is being conducted in the Chromium project.

This reverts commit 756b8281b5b76b2ae4561d3cf8c29a46689cf23f.

Reason for revert: New tests are very flaky. Example:
https://analysis.chromium.org/p/chromium/flake-portal/flakes/occurrences?key=ag9zfmZpbmRpdC1mb3ItbWVylgELEgVGbGFrZSKKAWNocm9taXVtQGJsaW5rX3dlYl90ZXN0c0BleHRlcm5hbC93cHQvaHRtbC9icm93c2Vycy9icm93c2luZy10aGUtd2ViL2JhY2stZm9yd2FyZC1jYWNoZS9zZXJ2aWNlLXdvcmtlci1jb250cm9sbGVkLWFmdGVyLXJlc3RvcmUuaHR0cHMuaHRtbAw

https://analysis.chromium.org/p/chromium/flake-portal/flakes/occurrences?key=ag9zfmZpbmRpdC1mb3ItbWVyjgELEgVGbGFrZSKCAWNocm9taXVtQGJsaW5rX3dlYl90ZXN0c0BleHRlcm5hbC93cHQvaHRtbC9icm93c2Vycy9icm93c2luZy10aGUtd2ViL2JhY2stZm9yd2FyZC1jYWNoZS9zZXJ2aWNlLXdvcmtlci1jbGllbnRzLW1hdGNoYWxsLmh0dHBzLmh0bWwM

Original change's description:
> [WPT] BFCache: service worker clients
>
> This CL adds service worker tests for BFCache:
>
> - navigator.serviceWorker.controller
> - Fetch interception
> - Clients.claim()
> - Clients.matchAll() and
> - unregister().
>
> Expected behavior:
>
> - Controlled pages should remain controlled after
>   restored from BFCache, i.e.
>   navigator.serviceWorker.controller should remain non-null
>   and fetch should be intercepted.
> - Clients.claim() should evict pages
>   that would be affected from BFCache.
> - Clients.matchAll() shouldn't list pages in BFCache.
> - unregister() should evict controlled pages from BFCache.
>
> Failing tests:
>
> - service-worker-clients-claim.https.html:
>   On Safari/Firefox, Clients.claim() doesn't evict pages from BFCache.
> - service-worker-controlled-after-restore.https.html:
>   On Firefox, fetches are not intercepted after restored from
>   BFCache while `navigator.serviceWorker.controller` is non-null.
> - service-worker-unregister.https.html:
>   Controlled pages aren't evicted by unregister() (all browsers).
>
> Bug: 1107415, 1204228, w3c/ServiceWorker#1594
> Change-Id: I73233cf917e31dd91b974823d5490d0190f0eade
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/3201011
> Reviewed-by: Rakina Zata Amni <rakina@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Ben Kelly <wanderview@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Hiroshige Hayashizaki <hiroshige@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#1008327}

Bug: 1107415, 1204228, w3c/ServiceWorker#1594
Change-Id: I56ac20a492e2b1716d27867dc9c113b097833a6c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/3708190
Bot-Commit: Rubber Stamper <rubber-stamper@appspot.gserviceaccount.com>
Owners-Override: Phillis Tang <phillis@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Phillis Tang <phillis@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Phillis Tang <phillis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#1014735}
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants