Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update rust crate rustc-hash to v2 #95

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Oct 12, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
rustc-hash dependencies major 1.1.0 -> 2.0.0

Release Notes

rust-lang/rustc-hash (rustc-hash)

v2.0.0

Compare Source

  • Replace hash with faster and better finalized hash.
    This replaces the previous "fxhash" algorithm originating in Firefox
    with a custom hasher designed and implemented by Orson Peters (@orlp).
    It was measured to have slightly better performance for rustc, has better theoretical properties
    and also includes a significantly better string hasher.
  • Fix no_std builds

v1.2.0

Note: This version has been yanked due to issues with the no_std feature!

  • Add a FxBuildHasher unit struct
  • Improve documentation
  • Add seed API for supplying custom seeds other than 0
  • Add FxRandomState based on rand (behind the rand feature) for random seeds
  • Make many functions const fn
  • Implement Clone for FxHasher struct

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "every 3 months on the first day of the month" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants