Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DOC] Document RAPIDS UDF #1354

Closed
jlowe opened this issue Dec 9, 2020 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1478
Closed

[DOC] Document RAPIDS UDF #1354

jlowe opened this issue Dec 9, 2020 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1478
Assignees
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation P0 Must have for release

Comments

@jlowe
Copy link
Member

jlowe commented Dec 9, 2020

Report needed documentation
#1351 tracks implementing support for UDFs that provide a RAPIDS execution path. This is a user-visible feature that requires clear documentation on how users can implement their own RAPIDS-accelerated UDFs.

Describe the documentation you'd like
There should be a document under the docs/ directory that is dedicated to describing how UDFs and the RAPIDS Accelerator interact. That document should either directly describe how to implement a RAPIDS-accelerated UDF or point to a separate, dedicated document for RAPIDS UDFs. The document should contain pointers to the working examples of RAPIDS UDF implementations.

@jlowe jlowe added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation P0 Must have for release labels Dec 9, 2020
@jlowe jlowe self-assigned this Dec 9, 2020
@sameerz sameerz added this to the Jan 4 - Jan 15 milestone Jan 4, 2021
tgravescs pushed a commit to tgravescs/spark-rapids that referenced this issue Nov 30, 2023
…IDIA#1354)

Signed-off-by: spark-rapids automation <70000568+nvauto@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation P0 Must have for release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants