Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Re-enable noscaladoc check #474

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 30, 2020
Merged

Conversation

jlowe
Copy link
Member

@jlowe jlowe commented Jul 30, 2020

Now that the UCX fixes are in from #461 we can re-enable the noscaladoc check.

This reverts #464.

This reverts commit 76a1d4d.

Signed-off-by: Jason Lowe <jlowe@nvidia.com>
@jlowe jlowe added the build Related to CI / CD or cleanly building label Jul 30, 2020
@jlowe jlowe added this to the Jul 20 - Jul 31 milestone Jul 30, 2020
@jlowe jlowe self-assigned this Jul 30, 2020
@jlowe
Copy link
Member Author

jlowe commented Jul 30, 2020

build

@abellina abellina merged commit 0f79d8f into NVIDIA:branch-0.2 Jul 30, 2020
nartal1 pushed a commit to nartal1/spark-rapids that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2021
This reverts commit 76a1d4d.

Signed-off-by: Jason Lowe <jlowe@nvidia.com>
nartal1 pushed a commit to nartal1/spark-rapids that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2021
This reverts commit 76a1d4d.

Signed-off-by: Jason Lowe <jlowe@nvidia.com>
@jlowe jlowe deleted the reenable-noscaladoc branch September 10, 2021 15:30
pxLi pushed a commit to pxLi/spark-rapids that referenced this pull request May 12, 2022
* add HA specific commands to FLAdminAPI and improve usage description for show_stats command

* clean up code, address PR comments
tgravescs pushed a commit to tgravescs/spark-rapids that referenced this pull request Nov 30, 2023
Signed-off-by: spark-rapids automation <70000568+nvauto@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
build Related to CI / CD or cleanly building
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants