Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix checkout-ref for automerge #701

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 9, 2020

Conversation

pxLi
Copy link
Collaborator

@pxLi pxLi commented Sep 9, 2020

Signed-off-by: Peixin Li pxli@nyu.edu

As #668 got merged but existing PRs does not have to be rebased on that,

so the latest automerge files will not be checkout in triggered workflow since by default it uses the PR's base ref which is not we were expecting.

This PR is going to fix this by forcing checkout workflow files from the latest remote branch-0.2

After:
image

Before:
image

Signed-off-by: Peixin Li <pxli@nyu.edu>
@pxLi pxLi added bug Something isn't working build Related to CI / CD or cleanly building labels Sep 9, 2020
@pxLi
Copy link
Collaborator Author

pxLi commented Sep 9, 2020

build

@pxLi pxLi requested a review from jlowe September 9, 2020 18:27
@pxLi pxLi merged commit cf77594 into NVIDIA:branch-0.2 Sep 9, 2020
nartal1 pushed a commit to nartal1/spark-rapids that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2021
Signed-off-by: Peixin Li <pxli@nyu.edu>
nartal1 pushed a commit to nartal1/spark-rapids that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2021
Signed-off-by: Peixin Li <pxli@nyu.edu>
tgravescs pushed a commit to tgravescs/spark-rapids that referenced this pull request Nov 30, 2023
…IDIA#701)

Signed-off-by: spark-rapids automation <70000568+nvauto@users.noreply.github.com>

Signed-off-by: spark-rapids automation <70000568+nvauto@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working build Related to CI / CD or cleanly building
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants