Various Python 3.5 fixes

[jjhelmus]

Makes python 3.5 recipe similar to recipe in anaconda-recipes

[conda-forge-linter]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

[ocefpaf]

@jjhelmus I got my hands on a Win64 machine for the weekend. Let me know if you need help testing things.

[jjhelmus]

Apparently the patches in anaconda-recipes are not always valid. Will need to make my own.

[ocefpaf]

Apparently the patches in anaconda-recipes are not always valid. Will need to make my own.

I guess we should start packaging (and using) quilt to manage these.

[jjhelmus]

The patch problem is not really the fault of anaconda-recipes as they are applying an additional patch to site.py which when these two patches are applied in the correct order resolves fine. We don't want the site.patch patch from anaconda-recipes so regeneration of the other patch was needed.

[jakirkham]

Though I don't think OS X 32-bit has been supported for a bit. I don't have any problem with adding x86_64.

[jjhelmus]

I agree, for use in conda-forge the x86_64 tag is not needed but adding it makes the recipe match better with the one in anaconda-recipes.

[jjhelmus]

Any other comments on this issue? I was planning on merging this later today unless there is a show stopper.

I'll submit a similar update to Python 3.4 shortly.

[jakirkham]

What's going on with this?

[jjhelmus]

Both of those lines were taken from the python 3.5 recipe on anaconda-recipes

bin/python is a symbolic link to bin/python3.5 so it makes more sense to not link the true file as opposed to the symbolic link.

DLLs/_ctypes.py does not exist and it should be _ctypes.pyd, just a typo in the original recipe that was never caught. I believe it must be because of the comment above in the souce.

[jjhelmus]

Is this good to go?

[jakirkham]

Fine by me. Should we have someone look over the Windows stuff? I'm still fumbling in that area so might not be the best reviewer for that.

[msarahan]

Thanks @jjhelmus