Collections of recipes needing attention? #161
Comments
|
I'll try to come up with a list here. Sorry you are feeling overwhelmed. I'll try to restrict further questions and/or direct others to this issue so it can remain manageable. |
|
No problem - I'm overwhelmed with normal Continuum work anyway. It's life as normal. I just don't want to lose track of things here that I could help with - and I feel bad that I may have already missed a few instances where you all have pinged me. |
My hope is that conda-forge will in the long run make this less so. I expect everyone will enjoy a few less pings about updates to packages or at least can respond "please submit a PR". 😄 Admittedly, that is not the case while we are still try to figure out how it should work.
Absolutely, and I should be doing a better job at compiling these somewhere so we can track them.
No need to feel bad. There is just a lot going on here. |
|
The todo list feature works really well in gh issues - that is certainly one option @jakirkham. |
|
I use the (free) zenhub chrome plugin. It provides a few additional nice I think there are a few labels we would need:
Feel free to add more - I just think these are ones that would help me help On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 4:30 AM Phil Elson notifications@github.com wrote:
|
👍 to all that. Not sure if we can define label to an organization though. I guess they are defined at project level, right?
Never used, but I am OK for testing something new. |
You don't need to. It's just a way of viewing the same information that Github already has in different ways. It provides todo-lists also, but AFAICT, those are private. Still - give it a shot. I find it improves my ability to track stuff on Github. |
Yeah... bummer. Seems we're not the first people to think of this: https://github.com/repo-utils/org-labels also |
It is one of those things you never thought you'd use and one day you cannot live without it 😀 |
|
I was looking at different ways to help us track what is going on as I agree it is kind of busy here and it is hard to tell sometimes (especially with so many repos 😉). These appear to be free for open source. This seems like it might help ( https://sprint.ly/ ) the management side. This ( https://zube.io/ ) is pretty similar. Also, this ( https://waffle.io/ ) is ok for single repos like this one. Here is another neat one ( https://codetree.com/ ) that looks potentially good for issue tracking. Another similar one ( http://gitlo.co/ ). These are interesting, but need to be paid for somehow. This ( https://huboard.com/ ) could be tried, but I can't seem to find a good example of it in use. This ( https://www.blossom.co/ ) is similar to the first two. |
|
BTW, I tried enabling ZenHub for the org. Not sure how this ends up working as I have only begun using it. Will this let us use the same ZenHub or does every user setup their own? Anyways feel free to share feedback. As it is free for open source, we can use this for as long as we like. |
|
I don't see anything set up on ZenHub. I'm not sure if it is just sort of a local tool, storing its information in the plugin, or if it has some sharable content that other people can see. Please do not feel compelled to use it on my behalf. I'm happy to try any other tool - I just want something (anything) that can help unify labels. I feel like if we get the labels stuff done right, then anyone will be able to use any tool to track that metadata appropriately. |
|
I see stuff when I go to the "boards" tab. The information should be synchronized to zenhub's servers--I've used it for collaboration elsewhere. |
|
Yeah, I see stuff on the boards, but only for the two repos I linked myself. Wasn't sure if anyone had created/linked any other repos. Does each new feedstock need to be manually added? |
As a helpful tip, more than a thing you might actually want to do for this: If you can register with an API it can be batched up with the conda-smithy You would want to clone all of the feedstocks first though: |
|
Bit of a tangent, but could we get a copy of the |
|
@groutr - can you move the snappy recipe any time soon? |
|
sure. I can do it in the next day or two. |
|
I think we need the Windows build incantation for snappy. |
|
Also, we could probably use those Windows build incantations for OpenCV. |
|
Given that this Windows black magic seems to really be necessary for all multi-Python version projects - would it not make sense for that information to just be provided as an ENV variable? Or maybe a small script that is on the conda path that can be called? |
This would be ideal. |
|
So, this is very special. It appears the |
|
If someone has time and a Windows environment up and working, I would appreciate guidance on getting h5py working for Windows in this PR ( conda-forge/h5py-feedstock#1 ) or if you want to submit your own PR feel free. |
|
So, I have been working on protobuf support for C++ ( conda-forge/protobuf-feedstock#4 ). I have what looks so far to be working Windows support. Though I would appreciate feedback from others on anything else this might need. |
|
Could anyone with access please provide the YAML recipe? Appears that we can build it with C++ support, but that is not currently happening. Doesn't even have to be a pretty recipe. We can clean it up here. |
|
Will do tomorrow. On Mon, Apr 18, 2016, 21:55 jakirkham notifications@github.com wrote:
|
|
Actually I started hacking on one just to see how far I could get it to go. Maybe just your feedback should be enough. Though I was wrong about C++ support. That will require another yaml library. Will have to check and see that they don't clash with the C version. |
|
See this PR ( #397 ) for the yaml recipe that I hacked together. Windows side is at best a guess of what should work. Will see how it goes. If there is anything else I missed or is nice to add, please let me know. |
|
I copied the scripts from #751 manually (copy/paste), locally, and things work fine. I have tagged 1.21.1. Packages should be available soon, but I'll post here when they are. |
|
Did you use the docker container? |
|
Thanks @msarahan. 😄 |
|
No, just built the code for Mac. Sorry, tried docker, but I'm using the beta, and volume mounts don't seem to be working. =( I hope 1.21.1 is a solid release for us. |
|
Appveyor is showing some issues with Windows on the 3.4 stuff (as usual). You should probably expect some failures there. I'm working on it. I hope that the rest of the release will still be useful. |
|
Would you mind taking a look at this PR ( conda-forge/openblas-feedstock#6 ) when you have a chance, @msarahan? I think this is the fastest path forward ATM without winding up in trouble. It appears the |
|
Friendly nudge for reviewing this PR ( conda-forge/mpc-feedstock#3 ) when you have a chance, @msarahan. cc @isuruf |
|
There's not enough context here. Do you mean the activate scripts? They have not been removed AFAIK. Last I dealt with them, I wrote a test to ensure that they exist. |
|
Yeah, the symlinks to Interesting, well, we mysteriously are not seeing them get packaged even in cases where we have not released the |
|
Could you please double check that the |
|
Got a very strange error when trying to upgrade |
|
Could you please review PR ( conda-forge/cmake-feedstock#8 ) when you have a chance, @msarahan? |
|
@msarahan @patricksnape, could either or both of you please take a look at a couple PRs @jjhelmus has added to |
|
This can probably be done at your own pace (not sure @jjhelmus' timeline). Though it would be nice if some people could take a look at the proposed Python 2.7 recipe ( conda-forge/python-feedstock#62 ) and see if it makes sense or needs changes. |
|
Could you please take a look at this recipe for |
|
Could you please take a look at issue ( conda-forge/conda-feedstock#1 ) when you have a chance, @msarahan? Seems like the activation scripts are getting messed up in the |
|
Could you please provide some thoughts on PR ( #1205 ), @msarahan? The OP is working on a tool that allows one to call commands from a conda environment without having to explicitly activate first by having a wrapper that does this for you. There are variants for other things like |
|
Could you please take a look at issue ( conda-forge/openssl-feedstock#3 ), @msarahan? We are totally mystified. It seems that there is some |
|
This error is pretty weird. It appears FWICT that |
|
Think the story for directing and notifying about issues has gotten a bit better over the years. Partially by increasing reviewer bandwidth. Partially by adding reviewer teams. Partially by people reaching out on Gitter about things that are blocked periodically. Going to close this out. Feel free to reopen if there is something here that still needs to be addressed. |
I'm already feeling overwhelmed with keeping track of recipes that either need Windows modification or need attention at some later date (e.g. to include some Continuum changes that I know are available)
Is there any way we can consolidate these recipes/repos into a list that is easier to approach and to track? Perhaps a wiki page? Some Google spreadsheet? Create issues on those repos and assign people to them?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: