minor feedback added

0071-scaling-helium-transparently.md

@@ -11,11 +11,13 @@
 
 This HIP which builds on the excellent work done by the creators of [HIP-70][HIP-70] is focussed on delivering important structual changes to the Helium network as proposed in HIP-70. However it aims to improve on some of the shortcomings such as further centralisation (rather than decentralisation) of network activities. It also aims to introduce more formal governance structures which have been absent from prior proposals and will allow more predictable operation which is critical for enterprise adoption of the utility scale network we are all aiming to build.
 
+Another difference to the original Helium Scaling Proposal is the use of an enterprise distributed ledger technology (DLT) as an alternative example. **It is important to note that unlike the original HIP-70 this is more as an example how this technology can be used. This HIP proposes a formal evaluation and comparison phase (and some evaluation criteria) to ensure the best tool is eventually chosen** (see Governance section).
+
 In this HIP, we propose an alternative architecture for the Helium network to use the Hedera network as a layer 1. The new architecture is built to meet the number of requirements that we believe are critical to the network’s success. Our new design goals include network scalability, strong network governance, transparency in data reporting and rewards distribution, and decentralization.
 
-Another difference to the original Helium Scaling Proposal is the use of an enterprise distributed ledger technology (DLT) as an alternative example. **It is important to note that unlike the original HIP-70 this is more as an example how this technology can be used. This HIP proposes a formal evaluation and comparison phase (and some evaluation criteria) to ensure the best tool is eventually chosen**.
+As per [HIP-70][HIP-70] we also acknowledge that this change removes the need for staked validators operating block production and challenge creation as they do today. However, we would expect (some) validators to be ideal candidates for operators of decentralised oracles.
 
-We acknowledge that this change removes the need for staked validators operating block production and challenge creation as they do today. That said, we expect that HNT stakers will migrate their positions towards securing current and/or future subDAOs and participating in governance through the vote-escrow token based system proposed in [HIP-51][HIP-51]. Removal of the staked validator reward also returns the full 6.85% of HNT emissions back to the rewards pool, benefitting Hotspot owners on all subDAOs. In the first year alone, this is estimated to be over 2 million more HNT rewarded.
+That said, we expect that HNT stakers will migrate their positions towards securing current and/or future subDAOs and participating in governance through the vote-escrow token based system proposed in [HIP-51][HIP-51]. Removal of the staked validator reward also returns the full 6.85% of HNT emissions back to the rewards pool, benefitting Hotspot owners on all subDAOs. In the first year alone, this is estimated to be over 2 million more HNT rewarded.
 
 Similar to the [HIP-70][HIP-70] proposal these changes are complementary to the changes proposed in [HIP-51][HIP-51] and a necessary set of changes to more easily implement some of the redemption and governance mechanisms proposed in [HIP 51][hip 51], [HIP-52][HIP-52], and [HIP-53][HIP-53]. We also expect that more protocols will be attracted to participate in the Helium ecosystem because of the move to a more widely used Layer 1 blockchain.
 
@@ -40,7 +42,7 @@ In the last several months of the network, both have been challenging for networ
 
 This HIP has a direct impact on all stakeholders on the network. We believe that overall, Hotspot owners and Users of the network will see more consistent and reliable data transfer as discussed above.
 
-One set of stakeholders, namely validator stakers, staking pool operators, and validator-as-a-service providers, may be negatively impacted by this change but we believe these parties will continue to be able to participate in network activities. Stakers will be able to more actively participate in governance by staking their HNT into veHNT as described in [HIP-51][HIP-51] and earn subDAO tokens like IOT or MOBILE by assigning their veHNT to a network they “vote” for.
+One set of stakeholders, namely validator stakers, staking pool operators, and validator-as-a-service providers, may be negatively impacted by this change but we believe these parties will continue to be able to participate in network activities. Stakers will be able to more actively participate in governance by staking their HNT into veHNT as described in [HIP-51][HIP-51] and earn subDAO tokens like IOT or MOBILE by assigning their veHNT to a network they “vote” for. As mentioned above and covered below we do believe there is a need for those skills to operate decentralised oracles.
 
 # Detailed Explanation