Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🐛 fix demo output #560

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 3, 2024
Merged

🐛 fix demo output #560

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 3, 2024

Conversation

pranavgaikwad
Copy link
Contributor

This slipped through somehow after merging #351 I should have re-run CI before merging #557

Signed-off-by: Pranav Gaikwad <pgaikwad@redhat.com>
@pranavgaikwad pranavgaikwad requested a review from aufi April 2, 2024 23:51
Copy link
Member

@aufi aufi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@aufi aufi merged commit b5f82e5 into konveyor:main Apr 3, 2024
6 checks passed
@pranavgaikwad pranavgaikwad deleted the mainFix branch April 3, 2024 14:15
pranavgaikwad added a commit to pranavgaikwad/analyzer-lsp that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2024
This slipped through somehow after merging konveyor#351 I should have re-run CI
before merging konveyor#557

Signed-off-by: Pranav Gaikwad <pgaikwad@redhat.com>
pranavgaikwad added a commit to pranavgaikwad/analyzer-lsp that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2024
This slipped through somehow after merging konveyor#351 I should have re-run CI
before merging konveyor#557

Signed-off-by: Pranav Gaikwad <pgaikwad@redhat.com>
pranavgaikwad added a commit to pranavgaikwad/analyzer-lsp that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2024
This slipped through somehow after merging konveyor#351 I should have re-run CI
before merging konveyor#557

Signed-off-by: Pranav Gaikwad <pgaikwad@redhat.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants