Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: enable KUBECONFIG default for functest #156

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 16, 2024

Conversation

nestoracunablanco
Copy link
Contributor

What this PR does / why we need it: enable KUBECONFIG default for functest

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Release note:


Signed-off-by: Nestor Acuna-Blanco <nestor.acuna@ibm.com>
@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has DCO signed all their commits. labels Jul 16, 2024
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Jul 16, 2024
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 16, 2024

Hi @nestoracunablanco. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubevirt member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@jcanocan
Copy link

/ok-to-test

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Jul 16, 2024
@0xFelix
Copy link
Member

0xFelix commented Jul 16, 2024

Same issue as in kubevirt/common-instancetypes#196?

@akrejcir
Copy link
Collaborator

It's ok for now. Later we probably need to do a better fix, so the code checks that path if the env variable is not defined.

@nestoracunablanco
Copy link
Contributor Author

@akrejcir and @jcanocan thanks! @0xFelix, yes it is the same issue.

@akrejcir
Copy link
Collaborator

/approve

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: akrejcir

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 16, 2024
Copy link
Member

@0xFelix 0xFelix left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 16, 2024
@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot merged commit 1ca631d into kubevirt:main Jul 16, 2024
5 checks passed
@nestoracunablanco nestoracunablanco deleted the fix/kubeconfig branch July 22, 2024 15:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has DCO signed all their commits. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XS
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants