Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

statistics: batch insert topn and bucket when saving table stats #35326

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Jun 20, 2022

Conversation

xuyifangreeneyes
Copy link
Contributor

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: ref #35142

Problem Summary:

Analyze partition table is slower than analyze non-partition table with the same amount of data.

What is changed and how it works?

In SaveTableStatsToStorage, we execute one insert statement for each topn and each bucket so there are too many insertions in the transaction and make the function time-consuming. The PR batches insertions for topn and bucket and make SaveTableStatsToStorage more efficient.

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
    For a table with 40 million rows and 20 partitions, analyze takes 9min and SaveTableStatsToStorage for one partition takes 21s. After the PR, analyze takes 3min and SaveTableStatsToStorage for one partition takes 4s.
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Jun 13, 2022

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • Yisaer
  • winoros

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. needs-cherry-pick-4.0 needs-cherry-pick-release-5.0 needs-cherry-pick-release-5.1 needs-cherry-pick-release-5.2 needs-cherry-pick-release-5.3 Type: Need cherry pick to release-5.3 needs-cherry-pick-release-5.4 Should cherry pick this PR to release-5.4 branch. needs-cherry-pick-release-6.1 Should cherry pick this PR to release-6.1 branch. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jun 13, 2022
@xuyifangreeneyes
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cc @winoros @Yisaer @chrysan

@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Jun 13, 2022

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Jun 20, 2022
@winoros
Copy link
Member

winoros commented Jun 20, 2022

/merge

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Jun 20, 2022
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: d501085

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Jun 20, 2022
@hawkingrei
Copy link
Member

/run-mysql-test

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit 6266817 into pingcap:master Jun 20, 2022
ti-srebot pushed a commit to ti-srebot/tidb that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2022
Signed-off-by: ti-srebot <ti-srebot@pingcap.com>
@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor

cherry pick to release-4.0 in PR #35544

ti-srebot pushed a commit to ti-srebot/tidb that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2022
Signed-off-by: ti-srebot <ti-srebot@pingcap.com>
@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor

cherry pick to release-5.0 in PR #35545

ti-srebot pushed a commit to ti-srebot/tidb that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2022
Signed-off-by: ti-srebot <ti-srebot@pingcap.com>
@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor

cherry pick to release-5.1 in PR #35546

ti-srebot pushed a commit to ti-srebot/tidb that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2022
Signed-off-by: ti-srebot <ti-srebot@pingcap.com>
@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor

cherry pick to release-5.2 in PR #35547

ti-srebot pushed a commit to ti-srebot/tidb that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2022
Signed-off-by: ti-srebot <ti-srebot@pingcap.com>
@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor

cherry pick to release-5.3 in PR #35548

ti-srebot pushed a commit to ti-srebot/tidb that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2022
Signed-off-by: ti-srebot <ti-srebot@pingcap.com>
@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor

cherry pick to release-5.4 in PR #35549

ti-srebot pushed a commit to ti-srebot/tidb that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2022
Signed-off-by: ti-srebot <ti-srebot@pingcap.com>
@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor

cherry pick to release-6.0 in PR #35550

ti-srebot pushed a commit to ti-srebot/tidb that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2022
Signed-off-by: ti-srebot <ti-srebot@pingcap.com>
@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor

cherry pick to release-6.1 in PR #35551

@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Jun 20, 2022

TiDB MergeCI notify

🔴 Bad News! [1] CI still failing after this pr merged.
These failed integration tests don't seem to be introduced by the current PR.

CI Name Result Duration Compare with Parent commit
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-common-test 🔴 failed 2, success 9, total 11 17 min Existing failure
idc-jenkins-ci/integration-cdc-test 🟢 all 34 tests passed 27 min Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/common-test 🟢 all 12 tests passed 14 min Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/tics-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 12 min Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/sqllogic-test-2 🟢 all 28 tests passed 9 min 31 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/sqllogic-test-1 🟢 all 26 tests passed 8 min 23 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-ddl-test 🟢 all 6 tests passed 7 min 9 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-compatibility-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 4 min 27 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/mybatis-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 4 min 8 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/plugin-test 🟢 build success, plugin test success 4min Existing passed

morgo added a commit to morgo/tidb that referenced this pull request Jun 28, 2022
* upstream/master:
  sessionctx: support encoding and decoding session variables (pingcap#35531)
  planner: add batch_point_get access object (pingcap#35230)
  sessionctx: set skipInit false for TiDBOptProjectionPushDown and TiDBOptAggPushDown (pingcap#35491)
  *: add support for disabling noop variables (pingcap#35496)
  lightning: add store write limiter (pingcap#35193)
  expression: avoid padding 0 when implicitly cast to binary (pingcap#35053)
  types: fix creating partition tables fail in ANSI_QUOTES mode (pingcap#35379)
  executor: add the missed runtime stats when the index merge partial task returns 0 row (pingcap#35297)
  statistics: batch insert topn and bucket when saving table stats (pingcap#35326)
  parser: Add support for INTERVAL expr unit + expr (pingcap#30253) (pingcap#35390)
  config: add missing nodelay example (pingcap#35255)
  *: Introduce `OptimisticTxnContextProvider` for optimistic txn (pingcap#35131)
  statistics: fix panic when using wrong globalStats.Indices key (pingcap#35424)
  *: fix store token is up to the limit in test (pingcap#35374)
  *: enable more flaky and update bazel config (pingcap#35500)
  ddl: expose getPrimaryKey() as a public method of model.TableInfo (pingcap#35512)
  expression, util: add `KeyWithoutTrimRightSpace` for collator (pingcap#35475)
  infoschema: try on each PD member until one succeeds or all fail (pingcap#35285)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
needs-cherry-pick-release-5.0 needs-cherry-pick-release-5.1 needs-cherry-pick-release-5.2 needs-cherry-pick-release-5.3 Type: Need cherry pick to release-5.3 needs-cherry-pick-release-5.4 Should cherry pick this PR to release-5.4 branch. needs-cherry-pick-release-6.1 Should cherry pick this PR to release-6.1 branch. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants