Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

store/copr: fix missting Request.TxnScope #43367

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 24, 2023

Conversation

you06
Copy link
Contributor

@you06 you06 commented Apr 24, 2023

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #43365

Problem Summary:

What is changed and how it works?

Fix missing Request.TxnScope so the global stale-read optimization will take effect.

Seems there is no place to add a test for handling request inside coprocessor, the code change is really simple and safe.

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

store/copr: fix missing `Request.TxnScope` so the global stale-read optimization will take effect.

Signed-off-by: you06 <you1474600@gmail.com>
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Apr 24, 2023

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • cfzjywxk
  • zyguan

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. do-not-merge/needs-triage-completed size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. needs-cherry-pick-release-7.1 Should cherry pick this PR to release-7.1 branch. and removed do-not-merge/needs-triage-completed labels Apr 24, 2023
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Apr 24, 2023
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Apr 24, 2023
@cfzjywxk
Copy link
Contributor

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Apr 24, 2023

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 175dd47

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Apr 24, 2023
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot merged commit 6a3721a into pingcap:master Apr 24, 2023
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-7.1: #43374.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
needs-cherry-pick-release-7.1 Should cherry pick this PR to release-7.1 branch. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

the Request.TxnScope is missing in distsql
4 participants