Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve keycode handling for RGB #7677

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jun 22, 2020
Merged

Conversation

drashna
Copy link
Member

@drashna drashna commented Dec 19, 2019

Description

Specifically, this adds explicit calls for the rgb matrix code to the process_record_rgb function.

Right now, if you have both RGB Light and RGB Matrix enabled, it will only let you control the RGB Light functions, with no way to control the RGB Matrix features.

Types of Changes

  • Core
  • Enhancement/optimization
  • Documentation

Checklist

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • I have tested the changes and verified that they work and don't break anything (as well as I can manage).

@drashna drashna requested a review from a team December 19, 2019 09:31
docs/feature_rgb_matrix.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@drashna drashna requested a review from a team January 21, 2020 19:10
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Mar 6, 2020

Thank you for your contribution!
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had activity in the last 45 days. It will be closed in 30 days if no further activity occurs. Please feel free to give a status update now, or re-open when it's ready.
For maintainers: Please label with awaiting review, breaking_change, in progress, or on hold to prevent the issue from being re-flagged.

drashna and others added 6 commits April 12, 2020 20:21
Especially when both RGB Light and RGB Matrix are enabled at the same time
Co-Authored-By: drashna <drashna@live.com>
Copy link
Member

@noroadsleft noroadsleft left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me otherwise.

@drashna drashna requested review from zvecr and a team April 28, 2020 00:40
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jun 12, 2020

Thank you for your contribution!
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had activity in the last 45 days. It will be closed in 30 days if no further activity occurs. Please feel free to give a status update now, or re-open when it's ready.
For maintainers: Please label with awaiting review, breaking_change, in progress, or on hold to prevent the issue from being re-flagged.

Copy link
Member

@Erovia Erovia left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@Erovia Erovia requested a review from a team June 21, 2020 10:01
@Erovia Erovia merged commit 98642ca into qmk:master Jun 22, 2020
@drashna drashna deleted the rgb/keycode_processing branch July 2, 2020 00:14
jakobaa pushed a commit to jakobaa/qmk_firmware that referenced this pull request Jul 7, 2020
Co-authored-by: drashna <drashna@live.com>
Co-authored-by: noroadsleft <18669334+noroadsleft@users.noreply.github.com>
drashna added a commit to zsa/qmk_firmware that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2020
Co-authored-by: drashna <drashna@live.com>
Co-authored-by: noroadsleft <18669334+noroadsleft@users.noreply.github.com>
BorisTestov pushed a commit to BorisTestov/qmk_firmware that referenced this pull request May 23, 2024
Co-authored-by: drashna <drashna@live.com>
Co-authored-by: noroadsleft <18669334+noroadsleft@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants