Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dask_cudf.read_csv has no docstring #2277

Closed
gravitino opened this issue May 2, 2019 · 3 comments · Fixed by #8355
Closed

dask_cudf.read_csv has no docstring #2277

gravitino opened this issue May 2, 2019 · 3 comments · Fixed by #8355
Assignees
Labels
dask Dask issue doc Documentation

Comments

@gravitino
Copy link

dask_cudf.read_csv has no docstring. At least one should state that you forward the arguments to cudf.read_csv.

@mrocklin
Copy link
Collaborator

mrocklin commented May 2, 2019 via email

@jangorecki
Copy link

jangorecki commented Jan 10, 2020

It would be very useful to include in documentation a complete working example of using managed memory. In plain cudf: cudf.set_allocator("managed"). That would cover #2288 too. If possible, examples using dask in a both setup types, a non-cluster, and a cluster one mentioned in #2288: client = Client(cluster) way.

@jangorecki
Copy link

jangorecki commented May 14, 2020

is it possible to assign this issue to a planned milestone/sprint?

@kkraus14 kkraus14 added dask Dask issue doc Documentation and removed dask-cudf labels May 29, 2020
@galipremsagar galipremsagar self-assigned this May 25, 2021
rapids-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 26, 2021
Fixes: #2277 

This PR adds python docstring for `dask_cudf.read_csv` API.

Authors:
  - GALI PREM SAGAR (https://github.com/galipremsagar)

Approvers:
  - Keith Kraus (https://github.com/kkraus14)
  - Ayush Dattagupta (https://github.com/ayushdg)

URL: #8355
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dask Dask issue doc Documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

6 participants