Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bootstrap: Improve wording on docs for verbose-tests #74334

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 14, 2020

Conversation

jyn514
Copy link
Member

@jyn514 jyn514 commented Jul 14, 2020

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jul 14, 2020
@jyn514
Copy link
Member Author

jyn514 commented Jul 14, 2020

@bors rollup=always

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 14, 2020

@jyn514: 🔑 Insufficient privileges: not in try users

@jyn514
Copy link
Member Author

jyn514 commented Jul 14, 2020

Oh hmm I thought that only made a difference if the PR had already been reviewed.

@spastorino
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup=always

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 14, 2020

📌 Commit ba661d8 has been approved by spastorino

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 14, 2020

🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 5, this pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 14, 2020
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 14, 2020
…arth

Rollup of 11 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#73759 (Add missing Stdin and StdinLock examples)
 - rust-lang#74211 (Structured suggestion when not using struct pattern)
 - rust-lang#74228 (Provide structured suggestion on unsized fields and fn params)
 - rust-lang#74252 (Don't allow `DESTDIR` to influence LLVM builds)
 - rust-lang#74263 (Slight reorganization of sys/(fast_)thread_local)
 - rust-lang#74271 (process_unix: prefer i32::*_be_bytes over manually shifting bytes)
 - rust-lang#74272 (pprust: support multiline comments within lines)
 - rust-lang#74332 (Update cargo)
 - rust-lang#74334 (bootstrap: Improve wording on docs for `verbose-tests`)
 - rust-lang#74336 (typeck: use `item_name` in cross-crate packed diag)
 - rust-lang#74340 (lint: use `transparent_newtype_field` to avoid ICE)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit aedb7c3 into rust-lang:master Jul 14, 2020
@jyn514 jyn514 deleted the config-toml-docs branch July 14, 2020 23:45
# Emits extraneous output from tests to ensure that failures of the test
# harness are debuggable just from logfiles.
# Emits extra output from tests so test failures are debuggable just from logfiles.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Quoting myself from rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#795 (comment):

This change doesn't seem right, specifically "test harness" refers to the code running the tests, rather than the tests themselves. And it is extraneous for the common case of e.g. libtest not crashing.

cc @Mark-Simulacrum

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

verbose tests indeed changes nothing about tests, only the harnesses (compiletest and libtest) which invoke them.

jyn514 added a commit to jyn514/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 31, 2020
tmandry added a commit to tmandry/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 9, 2020
Address review comments about config.toml from rustc-dev-guide PR

This info was lost in rust-lang#74334. See also rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#795 (review).
r? @Mark-Simulacrum or @eddyb
@cuviper cuviper added this to the 1.47.0 milestone May 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants