-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 187
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update tbb to 2020 3 #2447
Merged
Merged
Update tbb to 2020 3 #2447
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
1f48fe0
update tbb script to change name from onetbb to tbb
SteveBronder 4ab57be
upgrading to TBB version 2020.3; removing old TBB library
SteveBronder 7061735
upgrading to TBB version 2020.3; modifying with new version number
SteveBronder 5f499ac
upgrading to TBB version 2020.3; adding unmodified TBB library
SteveBronder d48d005
upgrading to TBB version 2020.3; pruning files
SteveBronder 420b2ea
remove normal priority argument in new interface init threadpool so 2…
SteveBronder cbc3565
use tbb version major macro for deciding to use new interface
SteveBronder 1e321cc
update to develop
SteveBronder 91bbd12
use tbb version major macro for deciding to use new interface
SteveBronder 62317cf
remove merge conflict lines
SteveBronder 8184dc4
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/develop' into feature/update-tbb…
SteveBronder 9730ca7
add -Wno-deprecated-copy when building tbb for gcc
SteveBronder File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
use tbb version major macro for deciding to use new interface
- Loading branch information
commit 91bbd128146d97cb7a0646f97770191db45bf93d
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This breaks external oneTBB since
tbb/tbb_stddef.h
is not found:TBB_VERSION_MAJOR
is now defined intbb/version.h
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks! So seems we need to add another ONE_TBB compile time define.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll submit a hot fix shortly; testing it now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@rok-cesnovar #2452 does the trick.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll put in a fix pr. I think we can just move
#ifndef TBB_INTERFACE_NEW
up since if they have that defined then we know already we are using the new interfaceThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, that is what @hsbadr did in #2452
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Exactly :)