Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update tox environments #1967

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 18, 2023
Merged

Update tox environments #1967

merged 2 commits into from
Aug 18, 2023

Conversation

atugushev
Copy link
Member

Since tox==4.9.0, only explicitly declared environments are permitted to run.

Refs: tox-dev/tox#3096 (comment)

Contributor checklist
  • Included tests for the changes.
  • PR title is short, clear, and ready to be included in the user-facing changelog.
Maintainer checklist
  • Verified one of these labels is present: backwards incompatible, feature, enhancement, deprecation, bug, dependency, docs or skip-changelog as they determine changelog listing.
  • Assign the PR to an existing or new milestone for the target version (following Semantic Versioning).

Since tox==4.9.0, only explicitly declared environments are
permitted to run.
@atugushev atugushev added the skip-changelog Avoid listing in changelog label Aug 18, 2023
@atugushev
Copy link
Member Author

FTR, failing docs build fixed in #1969.

Copy link
Member

@theryanwalker theryanwalker left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good 👍

@atugushev atugushev merged commit 5c36749 into jazzband:main Aug 18, 2023
35 of 36 checks passed
@atugushev atugushev deleted the tox-envlist branch August 18, 2023 22:03
@atugushev
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks @theryanwalker!

@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ jobs:
pip-version:
- latest
env:
TOXENV: pip${{ matrix.pip-version }}
Copy link
Member Author

@atugushev atugushev Aug 18, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

874 passed, 1791 warnings in 997.59s (0:16:37)

Wow, 17 minutes on pypy with coverage vs 4 minutes.

@webknjaz, do you remember why the coverage wasn't set up in the first place in #1379? The speed?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since we don't have any pypy specific code, we can simply turn off the coverage there.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess because of the slowness.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed in #1970.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
skip-changelog Avoid listing in changelog
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants