Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Semantic Convention Update: Tracking Issue #4572

Open
4 of 12 tasks
JamieDanielson opened this issue Mar 21, 2024 · 9 comments
Open
4 of 12 tasks

Semantic Convention Update: Tracking Issue #4572

JamieDanielson opened this issue Mar 21, 2024 · 9 comments
Labels
type:feature-tracking A feature with sub-issues that need to be addressed

Comments

@JamieDanielson
Copy link
Member

JamieDanielson commented Mar 21, 2024

Current Status

Current (latest) package of @opentelemetry/semantic-conventions uses semconv version v1.7.0, as seen in scripts/semconv/generate.sh.

There are breaking changes in semantic conventions over time, especially prominent in v1.21 with stabilized http attributes, so we want to update in a way that minimizes impact on end users and offers the environment variable option OTEL_SEMCONV_STABILITY_OPT_IN to allow specifying which attributes to use. See schema for 1.23.1 here that shows changes over time.

Steps required for semantic convention update

Note: Import @opentelemetry/semantic-conventions for stable semantic conventions. Import @opentelemetry/semantic-conventions/incubating for all semantic conventions, stable and unstable.

@JamieDanielson JamieDanielson added the type:feature-tracking A feature with sub-issues that need to be addressed label Mar 21, 2024
@JamieDanielson
Copy link
Member Author

@MSNev @pichlermarc I created this issue based on our conversation in the SIG meeting to help track the work required to update semantic conventions in otel-js. I believe the first and last few items here are generally uncontroversial, but I wanted to confirm the appropriate step is listed for keeping old semantic convention version intact.

Some languages have a subdirectory of every semconv version as mentioned here. At some point we've also talked about rolling our own that essentially just adds the new attributes into new files to be additive to the existing package, instead of keeping whole packages for each version. Curious for feedback on the approach we want to take.

@trentm
Copy link
Contributor

trentm commented Apr 17, 2024

Interesting, in open-telemetry/opentelemetry-js-contrib#2089 (comment) seemk got the impression that because SemanticAttributes usage is deprecated, they should turn to defining the attributes locally.
(Update: I misread the code. The PR is not defining semconv constants locally.)

I think a couple things could be improved in @opentelemetry/semantic-conventions:

Screenshot 2024-04-17 at 4 55 50 PM

  • The "you shoud use the individual exported constants SemanticAttributes_XXXXX" prose is out of date, I think.
  • The README still shows deprecated usage.

AbhiPrasad added a commit to getsentry/sentry-javascript that referenced this issue Apr 24, 2024
Fixes #11755

OpenTelemetry restructured their http semantic conventions and declared
them stable:
https://opentelemetry.io/blog/2023/http-conventions-declared-stable/

This has unfortunately not been reflected in OpenTelemetry JS yet,
blocked on them making everything backwards compat:
open-telemetry/opentelemetry-js#4572

For now we can directly reference `http.request.method`, the replacement
to `http.method`. When the OTEL SDK is finally updated to use proper
conventions, we can avoid hard coding the string.
@dyladan
Copy link
Member

dyladan commented May 9, 2024

@JamieDanielson i'm working on updating the semconv. I'm not clear what the action item "Make copy of existing semantic conventions by adding suffix 1_7 (@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions-1_7), and update imports everywhere, as suggested on #4235 (comment)" is motivated by. Am I correct in assuming this requirement is gone now that all deprecated attributes are available?

@dyladan
Copy link
Member

dyladan commented May 9, 2024

Take a peek here #4690

@trentm
Copy link
Contributor

trentm commented May 13, 2024

Note: I'm not strongly advocating this option over Dan's option in #4690 unless others think it worthwhile.

Dan's PR beat me to an attempt to update the semconv package. I had been considering a semconv package that had separate entry points for each semconv version -- somewhat similar to what OTel Go is doing. E.g.:

import { HTTP_METHOD } from '@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions/1_20';
import { HTTP_REQUEST_METHOD } from '@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions/1_21';

The migration path would be:

  • freeze '@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions' at the old 1.7 version, deprecate its usage
  • move our instrs to use @opentelemetry/semantic-conventions/1_7, then work through upgrade semconv usage in each package as appropriate
  • in 2.0, remove ability to use the top-level entry point, i.e. must use a specific version
  • periodically add new entry points for new https://github.com/open-telemetry/semantic-conventions/tree/main/schemas versions

Pros:

  • I like that instrumentation code needs to be explicit about what SemConv version it is written for.
  • Having a single schemaUrl export (for usage in instrumentationScope to explicitly state the semconv version being used by an instrumentation) would be cleaner. (With a single @opentelemetry/semantic-conventions entry point, the package would want to export a schemaUrl value for each version, e.g. const SCHEMA_URL_V1_25_0 = ... something like what Java is doing.)

Cons:

  • Someone would have to do the generator work. Dan's already mostly done the work for the "all attributes, including deprecated ones, in the top-level entry point".
  • Without some effort on reducing duplication and with a number of semconv version entry-points the @opentelemetry/semantic-conventions package might get quite big to install. (Note: this wouldn't be an issue for tree-shaking minifying builds, just a size increate for npm install-time.)

Update (2024-05-23): open-telemetry/semantic-conventions#551 (comment) and a comment above from a .NET perspective, argues in favour of separate entry-points for each semconv version, FWIW.

@JamieDanielson
Copy link
Member Author

Am I correct in assuming this requirement is gone now that all deprecated attributes are available?

We talked about this in the SIG meeting but for posterity, yes, the deprecated attributes being available to us in the latest semantic conventions removes the need to have multiple packages.

@juergen-walter
Copy link

Hi @JamieDanielson thank you for driving this important topic! If I see correctly, there is more than a year of delay of adopting sematic conventions. For building and role out contents on top of changed fields, an envisioned time of arrival would be great to know!

@trentm
Copy link
Contributor

trentm commented Aug 9, 2024

@juergen-walter #4690 merged yesterday, so the next release from this repo will include a semantic-conventions package with constants from the latest Sem Conv version. Now we need to work through each package, as appropriate, an update their usage for the newer semconv version.

@JamieDanielson
Copy link
Member Author

@juergen-walter the new semantic conventions package v1.27 is now released

@JamieDanielson JamieDanielson pinned this issue Sep 17, 2024
@pichlermarc pichlermarc unpinned this issue Sep 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type:feature-tracking A feature with sub-issues that need to be addressed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants