Reorder description for snippets in rustdoc documentation #50858
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The example code snippets for the `no_run` and `compile_fail` attributes in the rustdoc documentation were followed by the description for the wrong attribute. This patch reorders the descriptions to match the code snippets.
|
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @GuillaumeGomez (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
steveklabnik
approved these changes
May 18, 2018
|
nice catch, thank you! @bors: r+ rollup |
|
📌 Commit cf1f038 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
kennytm
added a commit
to kennytm/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 19, 2018
…veklabnik Reorder description for snippets in rustdoc documentation The example code snippets for the `no_run` and `compile_fail` attributes in the rustdoc documentation were followed by the description for the wrong attribute. This patch reorders the descriptions to match the code snippets.
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 19, 2018
Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - #50531 (Cleanup uses of TypeIdHasher and replace them with StableHasher) - #50819 (Fix potential divide by zero) - #50827 (Update LLVM to 56c931901cfb85cd6f7ed44c7d7520a8de1edf97) - #50829 (CheckLoopVisitor: also visit break expressions) - #50854 (in which the unused shorthand field pattern debacle/saga continues) - #50858 (Reorder description for snippets in rustdoc documentation) - #50883 (Fix warning when building stage0 libcore) - #50889 (Update clippy) Failed merges:
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The example code snippets for the
no_runandcompile_failattributes in the rustdoc documentation were followed by the description for the wrong attribute. This patch reorders the descriptions to match the code snippets.